Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Progressive-Era Bureaucrats and the Unity of Twentieth-Century Indian Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID4040088
AuthorsRussel Lawrence Barsh (corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume15
Issue1
Pages1
Publication date1991-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Indian Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-182X • E-ISSN: 1534-1828
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1185205
OpenAlexW1968868928
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited3

THE HISTORY of American Indian policy has been described as a series of policy reversals driven by a dialectic of separation and assimilation.' The attention given to John Collier, credited with the renunciation of assimilation in the 1930s,2 strengthens the image of an heroic, Manichean struggle. A strong case can be made that Indian policy has been marked by a diversity of forms, but a continuity of effect, at least as far as land and resources are concerned.3 Continuity is inconsistent with heroes and struggles. It points to the steady, guiding hand of bureaucracy. Progressive-era bureaucrats viewed the subdivision of Indian lands, establishment of tribal governments and corporations, and transfer of federal responsibilities to the states as successive stages of a single policy of gradual integration and assimilation of Indians. In 1912 New York civic activist Arthur C. Ludington, a former colleague of Woodrow Wilson at Princeton University, was employed to prepare a re-assessment of Indian policy. Ludington's long-term plan, while never formally endorsed by the Indian Office,4 accurately anticipated events of the next fifty years. This suggests that Ludington crystallized the thinking of the generation of bureaucrats who were still in control when John Collier purportedly reversed direction in 1934

Assimilation (phonology · Bureaucracy · Dialectic · Diversity (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Renunciation · Sociology · Theology · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · History · Indian Economic and Social Development · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Race, History, and American Society

  • "The Touch of Civilization"

    Open Access•Steven Sabol•"The Touch of Civilization"•2017

  • Legitimate Expectations, Historical Injustice, and Perverse Incentives for Settlers

    Timothy Waligore•Moral Philosophy and Politics•2017

  • The Battle over Termination on the Colville Indian Reservation

    Open Access•Kathleen A Dahl•American Indian Culture and…•1994

  • Americanization on Native Terms

    Cristina Stanciu, Stanciu et al.•Native American and Indigenous…•2019

  • Rawls, self-respect, and assurance

    Open Access•Timothy Waligore•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2015

  • Making Canadian Indian Policy

    Roger Gibbins, Sally M Weaver•Canadian Public Policy•1982

  • Victorian Morality and the Supervision of Indian Women Working in Phoenix, 1906-1930

    Robert A Trennert•Journal of Social History•1988

  • The Human Element in Production

    Robert G Valentine•American Journal of Sociology•1917

Citations per year0.16
Citation span1994 - 2019 (26)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae