Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Edition of Books in Antiquity

Bibliographic Data

ID4062754
AuthorsHeiki Valk (0000-0003-4059-896X, corresponding author), H L M Van Der Valk
Year1957
Volume11
Issue1
Pages1-10
Publication date1957-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVigiliae Christianae (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-6032 • E-ISSN: 1570-0720
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/157007257x00015
OpenAlexW1965105609, W4213263668
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Prof. H. I. Marrou has recently discussed the technique of editing. Though the testimonies, adduced by him, mainly concern the Christian Fathers, he also speaks about the editions of classical authors (Marrou 1.1.222-4). I should like to make a few observations here, because Prof. M. hopes that the testimonies of the classical authors will be studied anew in the light of the evidence adduced by him. If I understand Prof. M. well, he is inclined to think that the part played by the bibliopola in the publication of a book, was negligible. He rather supposes that the author followed other ways and chose an influential friend as a depositary of the principal copy, from which other copies might be made. This view seems, in fact, to be confirmed by the testimony of Augustine who had a book published by means of the deacon Firmus (cf. Marrou .11.). Since this testimony is incontrovertible, I can understand Prof. M. to have been influenced by it. However, I do not think that it can be generalised. In this connection, I draw attention to Martial, whose enuncia tions, if properly explained, are convincing. As we know, the books of Martial's Epigrams were originally published successively and separately. We may begin with the first book, where we may single uot the opening poem (I 2) and the last but one (I 117). In I 2 Martial expressly informs the reader that the book can be got from a book-seller Secundus, 2 while also in I 117 Martial refers an acquaintance Lupercus, who tries to borrow the book, to a book-seller, Atrectus. We see that in two important places of the book, viz. the beginning and the end, Martial draws the attention to the librarian, let us say the publisher. In the opening poem, he recommends the edition in membrana, which is the popular and

Art · Biblical studies · Late Antiquity · Literature · Poetry · Principal (computer security · Theology · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Studies and Legal History · Classics · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy

  • Martial's Rome

    Open Access•Victoria Rimell, Victoria E Rimell•Martial's Rome•2009

  • Plagiarism and Poetic Identity in Martial

    J Mira Seo•The American Journal of Philology•2009

  • ATΗΣ ΑΤΕΡ. A Note on Sophocles, Antigone 2-6

    Mauro Agosto•Mnemosyne•2018

Citations per year0.18
Citation span2009 - 2018 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae