The Gospel of Barnabas, the Diatessaron, and Method
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4064185 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrich Schmid (0000-0001-9831-8583, 1Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands), August Den Hollander (2Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Vigiliae Christianae (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0042-6032 • E-ISSN: 1570-0720 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/004260307x164458 |
| OpenAlex | W1985769835 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Since the beginning of the 20th century research aiming at reconstructing Tatian's lost Gospel harmony Diatessaron utilizes a growing number of late 13-15 c. texts extant in various Western vernaculars for this purpose. As the most recent example Jan Joosten introduced the so-called Gospel of Barnabas, a composition perhaps as late as the 16th or 17th century as a potential source for readings of the Diatessaron (2nd c.). With special emphasis on methodological issues, this essay offers a detailed critique of Joosten's analysis as well as a general critique of that type of research as carried out by other scholars in the past
Art · Biblical studies · Emphasis (telecommunications · Extant taxon · Gospel · Harmony (color · Literature · Theology · Visual arts · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,12 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2016 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |