Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel

Bibliographic Data

ID4065840
AuthorsBirger Pearson
Year1967
Volume21
Issue2
Pages128
Publication date1967-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeREVIEW
Review ofHistorical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel, C H Dodd, 1963
VenueVigiliae Christianae (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-6032 • E-ISSN: 1570-0720
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1582044
OpenAlexW1980351564
LanguageEN

To distinguish between history and interpretation is difficult in all the gospels, and perhaps most difficult in the Fourth Gospel. In his sequel to The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel, Dr Dodd attempts, with the historical question in mind, to discover the particular strain of common tradition on which the unknown author worked. This detailed study of St John's Gospel is in two parts. In the first Dr Dodd examines the narrative material - the Passion narrative, the Ministry and the chapters on John the Baptist and the first disciples - and in the second he makes a detailed examination of the Sayings. As against theories which assert the dependence of the Fourth Gospel on one or more of the Synoptic Gospels, Dr Dodd marshals a mass of evidence to show that behind it there lies an ancient tradition independent of the Synoptic Gospels, deserving serious consideration as a contribution to our knowledge of the historical facts concerning Christ. This critical and historical investigation of the most significant and original of books completes Dr Dodd's study of the Fourth Gospel. It is persuasive in the coherence of its results, as well as of absorbing interest in its working. It has been welcomed by all students of Christian origins as an important addition to our understanding of the earliest traditions about Jesus, and of the character of this Gospel

Art · Biblical studies · Gospel · Literature · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · History · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub