Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Woman at the Keyhole

Women's Cinema and Feminist Criticism

Bibliographic Data

ID4070735
AuthorsJudith Mayne (corresponding author)
Year1981
Issue23
Pages27
Publication date1981-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew German Critique (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0094-033X • E-ISSN: 1558-1462
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/487935
OpenAlexW2330031313
LanguageEN
Citations received7

The term seems, if not necessarily simple to define, then at least straightforward enough. But term has acquired two different meanings which, to some minds, are diametrically opposed. It is at hypothetical intersection of these two meanings, rather than with favoring of one over other, that I begin. First, women's cinema refers to films made by women. They range from classical Hollywood directors like Dorothy Arzner and Ida Lupino to their more recent heirs, like Claudia Weill and Joan Silver; and from directors whom many feminists would just as soon forget, like Leni Riefenstahl or Lina Wertmiuller, to other contemporary European directors concerned directly and consciously with female modes of expression, like Chantal Akerman and Helke Sander. They range as well from independent documentary filmmakers like Julia Reichert (co-director of Union Maids) and Connie Fields (Rosie Riveter) to more experimental independents attempting to reconcile feminist politics and avant-garde form, like Michelle Citron (Daughter Rite) and Sally Potter (Thriller). To attempt to account for wide diversity of films represented in even this simple definition of is a gigantic task in and of itself. The term cinema, or more precisely, woman's film, has acquired another meaning, referring to a Hollywood product designed to appeal to a specifically female audience. Such films, popular throughout 1930s, 40s, and 50s, were usually melodramatic in tone and full of highpitched emotion, from which came pejorative title: the weepies. Indeed, Molly Haskell characterizes woman's as most untouchable of film genres. Here is how Haskell defines genre: At lowest level, as soap opera, 'woman's film' fills a masturbatory need, it is soft-core emotional porn for frustrated housewife. The weepies are founded on a mock-Aristotelian and politically conservative aesthetic whereby women spectators are moved, not by pity and fear but by self-pity and tears, to accept, rather than reject, their lot. That there

Art · Criticism · Keyhole · Literature · Movie theater · Cinema and Media Studies · Materials Science

  • Making women amateur filmmakers visible

    Open Access•Sarah Patricia Hill, Sarah Hill et al.•Women s History Review•2020

  • Counterhegemonic acts

    Helene A Shugart•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1997

  • Shifting Paradigms

    Open Access•K Sree Vidya, Vidya K•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2021

  • The Male Gaze in the Medical Classroom

    Amanda M Friz, Marissa L Fernholz•Women s Studies in Communication•2020

  • Réflexions sur les féminismes au cinéma (chantier en cours)

    Brigitte Rollet•Diogène•2021

  • Must We Acknowledge What We Mean? The Viewer's Role in Filmed Versions of A Streetcar Named Desire

    Pamela Anne Hanks•Journal of Popular Film and…•1986

  • Doing Film Feminisms in the Age of Popular Feminism

    Open Access•Claire Perkins, Jodi Brooks et al.•Australian Feminist Studies•2023

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,17
Citation span1986 - 2023 (38)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae