Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Bakke to Grutter and Gratz

The Supreme Court as a Policymaking Institution

Bibliographic Data

ID4073963
AuthorsKatherine C Naff (corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume21
Issue3
Pages405-427
Publication date2004-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Policy Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00084.x
OpenAlexW1981414487
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited16

Finding the best means for ensuring equal opportunities for women and minorities has long been controversial and initial efforts to do so were addressed by executive orders, and later the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, this paper argues, since its initial Bakke decision in 1978, it is the Supreme Court that has set policy in this area. In the twenty-five years between that decision and the recent Gratz and Grutter decisions, the court has shifted in its stance, in many cases declaring unconstitutional what it once sanctioned. That shift has not resulted from changes in laws or new amendments to the Constitution, nor can it be seen as reflecting public opinion, as that is not clear-cut. Rather, affirmative action policy has reflected the ideological stances of the justices sitting at the time a decision was rendered. The paper concludes with an assessment as to what this means for a democracy

Affirmative action · Constitution · Democracy · Institution · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Issues in South Africa

  • Embracing Diversity

    Open Access•Daniel N Lipson•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • Liberal–conservative conflict and consensus in policy making

    Open Access•Carl Grafton, Anne Permaloff•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • Workforce Diversity in the New Millennium

    Open Access•David W Pitts, Lois Recascino Wise•Review of Public Personnel…•2009

  • Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Tools

    Open Access•Christine H Roch, David W Pitts et al.•Administration & Society•2010

  • A Solution in Search of a Problem? Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and the New Public Service

    Open Access•Sally Coleman Selden•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Experiencing Discrimination

    Open Access•Monique R Payne-Pikus, Monique R Payne et al.•Law & Society Review•2010

  • Beyond Gratz and Grutter

    Open Access•Euel W Elliott, Andrew I E Ewoh•Review of Policy Research•2005

  • The civil rights era

    Hugh Davis Graham•The civil rights era•1990

  • The Federalist

    Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Fletcher Wright et al.•Federalist•1961

  • The Ironies of Affirmative Action

    John D Skrentny•Ironies of Affirmative Action•1996

  • The impact of issue framing on public opinion

    Open Access•Terri Susan Fine•The Social Science Journal•1992

  • The Supreme Court, Affirmative Action, and Public Management

    Open Access•J Edward Kellough•The American Review of Public…•1991

  • Trends

    Charlotte Steeh, Maria Krysan•Public Opinion Quarterly•1996

  • The Choices Judges Make

    Open Access•Martin Van Hees, Bernard Steunenberg•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • The Black-White Test Score Gap

    Christopher Jencks, Meredith Phillips•Black-White Test Score Gap•2011

  • The Evolution of an Issue

    Open Access•E Donald Elliott, Euel Elliott et al.•Review of Policy Research•2000

  • Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics

    Sally F Zerker, Paul Burstein•Labour / Le Travail•1988

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Political Science Review•1994

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2005 - 2010 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae