State Environmental Regulation and Economic Development
Are They Compatible
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4074091 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Davis (0000-0002-4080-8579, Colorado State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 149-157 |
| Publication date | 1992-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00341.x |
| OpenAlex | W2147493048 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 6 |
An underlyingussumption of the partial preemption apprmh is the belief that minimum federal standmds contribute to the prospective decentralization of environmental protection programs by removing or reducing industry incentives to shop aroundfor states with a more lenient regulatory stance. This assumption was examined through a survey of chief executive oficers of pollution-generating firms. Tlze data suggest that corporate officials see regulatory climate m an important component of overhead ctxits. The author concludes that the desire to retain industries within state boundaries does inhibit the promulgation of strict environmental regulat ions by public officials
Business · Decentralization · Economics · Incentive · Market economy · Political science · Preemption · Promulgation · Public economics · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Engineering · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2019 (23) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |