Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding State Rulemaking Processes

Developing Fracking Rules in Colorado, New York, and Ohio

Bibliographic Data

ID4074444
AuthorsSara R Rinfret (0000-0002-5093-304X, Hartwick College), Sara Rinfret (Political Science Hartwick College), Jeffrey J Cook (Political Science Colorado State), Jeffrey Cook (0000-0001-7281-1177, Colorado State University), Michelle C Pautz (0000-0002-1941-7194, University of Dayton)
Year2014
Volume31
Issue2
Pages88-104
Publication date2014-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Policy Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ropr.12060
OpenAlexW2136040636
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited18

Rulemaking is an integral component of environmental policy at both the federal and state level; however, rulemaking at the state level is understudied. With this research, we begin to fill that gap by focusing on rulemaking regarding the issue of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in three states: Colorado, New York, and Ohio. This policy issue is well suited to begin exploring state-level rulemaking processes because the federal government has left fracking regulation to the states. Through semistructured interviews with a range of actors in the rulemaking process across these states, we establish a foundation from which future research in this area may build. This exploratory research yields some valuable insights into the roles different stakeholders are playing in regulating fracking in these three states, and our findings may be useful for explaining state-level rulemaking more generally

Business · Local government · Political science · Public relations · Rulemaking · State government · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Advocacy strategies of industry and environmental interest groups in oil and gas policy debates

    Jennifer A Kagan, Jennifer Kagan et al.•Policy & Politics•2023

  • Governing Complexity

    Open Access•Dustin Garrick, William Blomquist et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance

    Open Access•Mark Stephan, Graham R Marshall et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • Seeing Polycentrically

    Open Access•William Blomquist, William A Blomquist et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • State Agency Discretion and Entrepreneurship in Regulated Markets

    Open Access•Jake B Grandy, Shon R Hiatt•Administrative Science Quarterly•2020

  • Comparing and Analyzing Policy Formulation of Proposed and Final Public Policies

    Open Access•Catherine Y Chen, Christopher M Weible et al.•International Review of Public…•2023

  • Un‘covering’ blanket bonds

    Open Access•Nurun Naher, Adam Mayer et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2023

  • Geographies of Impact and the Impacts of Geography

    Open Access•Julia H Haggerty, A Kroepsch et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2018

  • A decade of Marcellus Shale

    Open Access•Jeffrey Jacquet, Anne N Junod et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2018

  • Fueling the boom or smothering it? Examining oil and gas policy differences across the states

    Open Access•Jonathan M Fisk, A J Good et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2017

  • Media representations of hydraulic fracturing and agriculture

    Open Access•Gretchen Sneegas•The Extractive Industries and…•2015

  • Supraregulatory agreements and unconventional energy development

    Open Access•Skylar Zilliox, Jessica M Smith•The Extractive Industries and…•2016

  • Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas

    Open Access•Andreas Goldthau•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Keep it local? Preferences for federal, state, or local unconventional oil and gas regulations

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, A Malin•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Many voices in the room

    Open Access•Patrick Bayer, Alexander Ovodenko•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Mechanisms of metapower & procedural injustices in the Colorado Oil and Gas Task Force decision-making process

    Stacia S Ryder, A Malin•Critical Policy Studies•2021

  • End of the (Pipe)Line? Understanding how States Manage the Risks of Oil and Gas Wells

    Open Access•Steven G Nelson, Jonathan M Fisk•Review of Policy Research•2021

  • Executive Actors and Environmental Enforcement

    Open Access•M Lynch, Joshua Ozymy et al.•Review of Policy Research•2019

  • Subnational Responses to Fracking in Canada

    Open Access•Angela Carter, Emily Eaton•Review of Policy Research•2016

  • Agenda‐Setting at the Energy‐Water Nexus

    Open Access•Jennifer Baka, Kate J Neville et al.•Review of Policy Research•2018

  • Talking at parties

    Open Access•Tracey Bark, Richard Crawford et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2025

  • Framing ‘fracking’

    Open Access•Laurence Williams, Phil Macnaghten et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Community economic identity and colliding treadmills in oil and gas governance

    Open Access•Adam Mayer•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2017

  • Exploring How Institutional Arrangements Shape Stakeholder Influence on Policy Decisions

    Open Access•Elizabeth Baldwin•Public Administration Review•2018

  • This land is your land, maybe

    Open Access•Stacia S Ryder, Peter M Hall•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Workplace Gains beyond the Wagner Act

    Open Access•H Johnston•Labor Studies Journal•2018

  • Down the Line

    Open Access•John Kester, Rachael M Moyer et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2015

  • Stakeholder Participation and Strategy in Rulemaking

    Open Access•Deserai A Crow, Elizabeth A Albright et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2019

  • Regulation timing in the states

    Open Access•Tracey Bark, Elizabeth Bell et al.•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Evaluating Stakeholder Participation and Influence on State‐Level Rulemaking

    Open Access•Deserai A Crow, Elizabeth A Albright et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2020

  • Framed for Compromise? The Role of Bill Framing in State Legislative Behavior on Natural Gas Policy

    Open Access•Nicole Kalaf-Hughes, Andrew Kear et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2018

  • Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation

    Open Access•Hannah Millar•Review of Policy Research•2020

  • Raising the stakes

    Open Access•Daniel N Kluttz•Socio-Economic Review•2019

  • The Power of Policy Regimes

    Open Access•Andreas Goldthau, Michael Labelle•Review of Policy Research•2016

  • Mitigating Mistrust? Participation and Expertise in Hydraulic Fracturing Governance

    Open Access•Kate J Neville, Erika Weinthal•Review of Policy Research•2016

  • Public Information and Regulatory Processes

    Open Access•Deserai A Crow, Elizabeth A Albright et al.•Review of Policy Research•2016

  • Reaping Rewards, or Missing out? How Neoliberal Governance and State Growth Machines Condition the Impacts of Oil and Gas Development on Local Well-Being

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, Shawn Olson Hazboun et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2022

  • Participation in American politics

    Roger W Cobb•Participation in American politics•1983

  • Lobbying and Policy Change

    F R Baumgartner, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•Lobbying and Policy Change•2009

  • Frames of Influence

    Open Access•Sara R Rinfret•Review of Policy Research•2011

  • Political Insulation and Legislative Interventions

    Open Access•Sarah Poggione, Christopher Reenock•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2009

  • State Legislative Influence over Agency Rulemaking

    Open Access•Brian J Gerber, Cherie Maestas et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2005

  • Understanding commenter influence during agency rule development

    Open Access•Keith Naughton, Celeste Schmid et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2009

  • Controlling the Levers of Power

    Richard Hoefer, Kristin M Ferguson et al.•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•2007

  • Inside the Black Box

    Open Access•William F West•Administration & Society•2009

  • Promoting Participation? An Examination of Rulemaking Notification and Access Procedures

    Open Access•Nathan D Woods, Neal D Woods•Public Administration Review•2009

  • Administrative Rulemaking

    Open Access•William F West, William West•Public Administration Review•2005

  • Legislative Professionalism and Influence on State Agencies

    Open Access•Nathan D Woods, Neal D Woods et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process

    Marissa Martino Golden•Journal of Public Administration…•1998

  • The Politics of Ex Parte Lobbying

    Susan Webb Yackee, W Yackee•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Conventional Politics for Unconventional Drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania's Early Move into Fracking Policy Development

    Open Access•Barry G Rabe, Christopher Borick•Review of Policy Research•2013

  • "The Politics of "Fracking

    Open Access•Charles Davis•Review of Policy Research•2012

  • A Comparative Analysis of Rulemaking Provisions in State Administrative Procedure Acts

    Open Access•Patty D Renfrew, David J Houston•Review of Policy Research•1987

  • The Environmental Protection Agency Regulates Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    Open Access•Jeffrey J Cook, Jeffrey Cook et al.•Review of Policy Research•2013

Unique citing works37
Citations per year3,36
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 36

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae