The feasibility issue

Bibliographic Data

ID4079162
AuthorsNicholas Southwood (0000-0002-5308-8814, Australian National University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume13
Issue8
Publication date2018-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12509
OpenAlexW2806552256
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited40

It is commonly taken for granted that questions of feasibility are highly relevant to our normative thinking-and perhaps especially our normative thinking about politics. But what exactly does this preoccupation with feasibility amount to, and in what forms if any is it warranted? This article aims to provide an opinionated introduction to, and clearer characterisation of, the feasibility issue. I begin by discussing the question of how feasibility is to be understood. I then turn to the question of feasibility's role, suggesting that there are two quite different kinds of role questions that may be at play, though they are often run together: a question about feasibility's normative significance; and a question about its proper use in informing our normative thinking. Finally, I consider how the feasibility issue differs from certain other related issues: the demandingness issue; the issue of whether "ought" implies "can"; and the "ideal versus non-ideal theory" issue

Epistemology · Ideal (ethics) · Normative · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub