Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Moral Judgment and Deontology

Empirical Developments

Bibliographic Data

ID4079265
AuthorsJoshua May (0000-0001-8604-479X, University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue11
Pages745-755
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12172
OpenAlexW1493544317
LanguageEN
References cited50

A traditional idea is that moral judgment involves more than calculating the consequences of actions; it also requires an assessment of the agent's intentions, the act's nature, and whether the agent uses another person as a means to her ends. I survey experimental developments suggesting that ordinary people often tacitly reason in terms of such deontological rules. It's now unclear whether we should posit a traditional form of the doctrine of double effect. However, further research suggests that a range of non-consequentialist factors influence moral judgment, including intentions, commissions, personal harm, and agent-centered commitments. Many, if not all, such factors appear to affect how involved the agent is in bringing about an outcome

Consequentialism · Deontological ethics · Doctrine · Economics · Epistemology · Harm · Moral dilemma · Political science · Principle of double effect · Ethics in Business and Education · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Sentimental Rules

    Shaun Nichol, Shaun Nichols•Sentimental Rules•2004

  • A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications

    Open Access•Marc Hauser, Michael A Hauser et al.•Mind & Language•2007

  • When ignorance is no excuse

    Open Access•L Young, Rebecca Saxe•Cognition•2011

  • The development of intent-based moral judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, Rachel Sheketoff et al.•Cognition•2013

  • Ethics and Intuitions

    Open Access•Peter Singer•The Journal of Ethics•2005

  • The Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson•The Yale Law Journal•1985

  • Who Shalt Not Kill? Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Adam Moore, Adam B Moore et al.•Psychological Science•2008

  • Pushing moral buttons

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2009

  • The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment

    Open Access•L Young, Fiery Cushman et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Universal moral grammar

    Open Access•John Mikhail•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2007

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, L Young et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Crime and punishment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman•Cognition•2008

  • The emotional dog and its rational tail

    Jonathan Haidt•Psychological Review•2001

  • Psychosemantics

    Jerry A Fodor•Psychosemantics•1987

  • Moral Philosophy and Linguistics

    Gilbert Harman•Proceedings of the Twentieth…•1999

  • The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • The Emotional Construction of Morals

    Jesse Prinz•Emotional Construction of Morals•2009

  • Side Constraints and the Structure of Commonsense Ethics

    Open Access•Theresa Lopez, Jennifer L Zamzow et al.•Philosophical Perspectives•2009

  • Unequal Vividness and Double Effect

    Open Access•Neil Sinhababu•Utilitas•2013

  • A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research

    Open Access•Jonathan McGuire, Robyn Langdon et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Omission and commission in judgment and choice

    Open Access•Mark Spranca, Elisa Minsk et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1991

  • The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience

    Open Access•Selim Berker•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

  • The Doctrine of Double Effect

    Open Access•W J Fitzpatrick•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • What Experimental Evidence Shows Us about the Role of Emotions in Moral Judgement

    Open Access•Heidi Maibom, Heidi L Maibom•Philosophy Compass•2010

  • The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing I

    Open Access•Fiona Woollard•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • Culture and Cognition

    P Dimaggio•Annual Review of Sociology•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae