Linguistic Intuitions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4079463 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jeffrey Maynes (0000-0003-3800-1992), Steven Gro (0000-0002-9224-8200, Johns Hopkins University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 714-730 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12052 |
| OpenAlex | W2331044492 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 68 |
Linguists often advert to what are sometimes calledlinguistic intuitions. These intuitions and the uses to which they are put give rise to a variety of philosophically interesting questions: Whatarelinguistic intuitions - for example, what kind of attitude or mental state is involved? Why do they have evidential force and how might this force be underwritten by their causal etiology? What light might their causal etiology shed on questions of cognitive architecture - for example, as a case study of how consciously inaccessible subpersonal processes give rise to conscious states, or as a candidate example of cognitive penetrability? What methodological issues arise concerning how linguistic intuitions are gathered and interpreted - for example, might some subjects' intuitions be more reliable than others? And what bearing might all this have on philosophers'ownappeals to intuitions? This paper surveys and critically discusses leading answers to these questions. In particular, we defend a 'mentalist' conception of linguistics and the role of linguistic intuitions therein
Cognition · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Linguistics · Philosophy of science · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Experimental Philosophy of Language
Tonal Minimal Pairs in Xitsonga
That’s correct! Brentano on intuitive judgement
Introduction
Philosophical Intuitions about Socially Significant Language
The many errors of Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth
Justifying the evidential use of linguistic intuitions
The philosophy of linguistics
Descriptive ineffability reconsidered
Contemporary Ordinary Language Philosophy
Sentence Comprehension
Ignorance of Language
Phrasal Movement and Its Kin
Speaking
The Philosophy of Philosophy
Monitoring and self-repair in speech
The native language of social cognition
Semantics, cross-cultural style
The Epistemology of Thought Experiments
Telling more than we can know
The Modularity of Mind
The Blackwell Companion to Phonology
Must we mean what we say? 1
Philosophical Methodology
Data in generative grammar
As a matter of facts – comments on Featherston's sticks and carrots
Data and grammar
Naive v. expert intuitions
Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science
Relax, lean back, and be a linguist
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
Experimental Syntax
Language in Mind and Language in Society
Observation Reconsidered
Saving the Phenomena
The Availability of What We Say
Perceptual Entitlement
Experimental Semantics
The Empirical Base of Linguistics
Toward a model of grammaticality judgments
Linguistic Intuitions Revisited
Linguistic Intuitions
Revisited Linguistic Intuitions
Are Linguists Better Subjects
New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind
The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics
Syntactic Judgment Experiments
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010
Anaphora and semantic interpretation
Gradience in linguistic data
Intuitions in linguistic argumentation
Language and other abstract objects
The Ins and Outs of Introspection
Theories of Reference and Experimental Philosophy
A Test of the Cognitive Assumptions of Magnitude Estimation
Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |