Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Research gaps in the philosophy of evidence-based medicine

Bibliographic Data

ID4079526
AuthorsAlexander Mebius (0000-0001-9730-2133, Stockholm Sweden, corresponding author), Ashley Graham Kennedy (Jupiter Medical Center), Jeremy Howick (0000-0003-0280-7206, Science Oxford)
Year2016
Volume11
Issue11
Pages757-771
Publication date2016-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12352
OpenAlexW2558775367
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited89

Increasing philosophical attention is being directed to the rapidly growing discipline of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Philosophical discussions of EBM, however, remain narrowly focused on randomization, mechanisms, and the sociology of EBM. Other aspects of EBM have been all but ignored, including (a) the nature of clinical reasoning and the question of whether it can be standardized; (b) the application of EBM principles to the logic, value, and ethics of diagnosis and prognosis; (c) evidence synthesis (systematic reviews and meta-analyses); and (d) the nature and ethics of placebo controls. Philosophical analysis in each of these areas has the potential to enhance the discussion of EBM methodology and practice

Alternative medicine · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Evidence-based medicine · Pathology · Philosophical methodology · Value (mathematics · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Computer Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Assigning Functions to Medical Technologies

    Open Access•Alexander Mebius•Philosophy & Technology•2017

  • Rethinking Medical Knowledge in the Post‐Pandemic Era

    Open Access•Micol Bronzini, Benedetta Polini•Sociology Compass•2025

  • Fast Methods for Drug Approval

    Open Access•Ahmad Yaman Abdin, Francesco De Pretis et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Evidence amalgamation in the sciences

    Open Access•Samuel C Fletcher, J Landes et al.•Synthese•2019

  • Meno’s paradox and medicine

    Open Access•Nicholas Binney•Synthese•2019

  • Psychiatric Diagnostic Reasoning

    Open Access•Adrian Kind•Philosophy Compass•2025

  • Evidence-Based Policy

    Nancy Cartwright, Jeremy Hardie•Evidence-based policy•2012

  • The Philosophy of Evidence‐Based Medicine

    Open Access•Jeremy Howick, Jeremy H Howick•Philosophy of Evidence-Based…•2011

  • Clinical versus statistical prediction

    Paul E Meehl•1954

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • Explaining the Brain

    Carl F Craver•Explaining the brain•2007

  • The Structure of Science

    Ernest Nagel, David Hawkins•American Journal of Physics•1961

  • The Powerful Placebo

    Henry K Beecher•Journal of the American Medical…•1955

  • Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis

    Open Access•Frank L Schmidt, In‐sue Oh et al.•British Journal of Mathematical…•2009

  • Functional Analysis

    Robert Cummins•The Journal of Philosophy•1975

  • Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy

    Open Access•Brendan Clarke, Donald Gillies et al.•Topoi•2014

  • Grade

    Open Access•Gordon H Guyatt, Gordon Guaytt et al.•BMJ•2008

  • Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

    Open Access•Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman et al.•PLoS ONE•2008

  • Evidence based medicine

    Open Access•David L Sackett, William Rosenberg et al.•BMJ•1996

  • Aspects of Scientific Explanation

    Carl Gustav Hempel•Aspects of Scientific Explanation•1970

  • What is diagnosis? Some critical reflections

    Open Access•Caroline Whitbeck•Metamedicine•1981

  • A weakened mechanism is still a mechanism

    Open Access•Alexander Mebius•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence

    Open Access•Jacob Stegenga•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011

  • Robust and Discordant Evidence

    Open Access•Spencer Phillips Hey•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Reliability in Mathematical Physics

    Open Access•Michael Liston•Philosophy of Science•1993

  • Why Most Sugar Pills Are Not Placebos

    Open Access•Bob Holman•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Randomization and the Design of Experiments

    Open Access•Peter Urbach•Philosophy of Science•1985

  • What Evidence in Evidence-Based Medicine

    Open Access•John Worrall, John L Worrall•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • Thinking about Mechanisms

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden et al.•Philosophy of Science•2000

  • Exposing the Vanities—and a Qualified Defense—of Mechanistic Reasoning in Health Care Decision Making

    Open Access•Jeremy Howick•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science

    Open Access•Kevin C Elliott, Daniel J Mckaughan•Philosophy of Science•2014

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae