Bradley's Regress
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4079780 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anna‐sofia Maurin (0000-0002-1797-4245, Lund University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Fascículo | 11 |
| Páginas | 794-807 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00516.x |
| OpenAlex | W2117179933 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
Ever since F. H. Bradley first formulated his (in)famous regress argument philosophers have been hard at work trying to refute it. The argument fails, it has been suggested, either because its conclusion just does not follow from its premises, or it fails because one or more of its premises should be given up. In this paper, the Bradleyan argument, as well as some of the many and varied reactions it has received, is scrutinized
Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
The Unity of the Proposition
Truthmakers
A World of States of Affairs
Truth and Truthmakers
Principles of Philosophical Reasoning
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics
The Four-Category Ontology
Metaphysics
Individuals
The Unity of a Tractarian Fact
Trope theory and the Bradley regress
Moderate Realism and Its Logic
Monism
Philosophical Reasoning
Truth-Makers
Turtles All the Way Down
Ontological Dependence
Truth and Predication
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,57 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |