The Hart-Fuller Debate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4079953 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Juan Vega Gomez (0009-0003-8190-3403, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-53 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12096 |
| OpenAlex | W1648109666 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
I will center the discussion of the Hart-Fuller debate on the five claims Hart mentions might be understood as legal positivisms main tenets: (1) the command theory; (2) the no necessary connection thesis; (3) the methodological claim; (4) the charge of positivism as formalism and the problem of interpretation; and (5) the meta-ethical confusion. In light of these five claims, I will explore whether the exchange of views between Hart and Fuller in 1957 truly amounted to a debate. Sorting out this issue is the aim of this article
Confusion · Epistemology · Linguistics · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Law · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
| Citations per year | 0.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2015 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |