Neurosexism and Neurofeminism

Bibliographic Data

ID4079972
AuthorsGinger A Hoffman (0000-0002-3674-8809, Saint Joseph's University, corresponding author), Robyn Bluhm (0000-0002-4187-0569, Michigan State University)
Year2016
Volume11
Issue11
Pages716-729
Publication date2016-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12357
OpenAlexW2551301737
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited62

As neuroscience has gained an increased ability to enchant the general public, it has become more and more common to appeal to it as an authority on a wide variety of questions about how humans do and should act. This is especially apparent with the question of gender roles. The term 'neurosexism' has been coined to describe the phenomenon of using neuroscientific practices and results to promote sexist conclusions; its feminist response is called 'neurofeminism'. Here, our aim is to survey the phenomena of neurosexism and neurofeminism using a largely philosophical approach, incorporating concepts from the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of science, ethics, and feminist philosophy. First, we delineate how neuroscientific studies purporting to show sex brain differences may be prone to bias at a number of methodological levels - including the choice of categories to be studied, and the choice of tools for data gathering, analysis, and presentation. Then, we show how interpretations of such studies may wrongly assume the notion of 'hard-wiring'. Furthermore, lack of attention to distinctions within philosophy of mind may result in a mistaken supposition that brain differences lead to mental and/or psychological and/or behavioral ones. It is not difficult to see how these forms of neurosexism, leading to claims of 'hard-wired' gender differences that map onto traditional and harmful gender stereotypes, raise ethical questions. We conclude by briefly considering one: are the harms caused by neurosexist studies and their interpretations outweighed by their potential benefits

Appeal · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Phenomenon · Philosophy of mind · Computer Science · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub