Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Obstacles to the Study of Lawyer-Client Interaction

The Biography of a Failure

Bibliographic Data

ID4084555
AuthorsBrenda Danet, Kenneth B Hoffman, Nicole C Kermish
Year1980
Volume14
Issue4
Pages905-922
Publication date1980-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3053213
OpenAlexW2332588251
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited18

This paper reports on an attempt by an interdisciplinary team to observe and record on tape lawyer-client interaction in the metropolitan Boston area in 1975-77. Current pressure for greater accountability to the public on the part of the legal profession makes the empirical, observational study of lawyer-client relations a timely, important topic. Despite the investment of much time and energy in creating conditions suitable for such a study, the project team failed to gain access to private lawyer-client encounters. The goal of the paper is to try to account for this failure, to analyze the nature of the obstacles encountered, and to stimulate speculation on how these obstacles might be overcome in the future. It is suggested that the doctrine of attorney-client privilege is the major obstacle which researchers must overcome. The idea of paying attorneys for their cooperation is also considered

Biography · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Psychology

  • How Technology Is (or Is Not) Transforming Law Firms

    Open Access•Ian Rodgers, John Armour et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2023

  • Interprofessional relations in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. An Australian case study

    Han Xu•Perspectives•2020

  • Divorce Attorneys and 40 Clients in Two Not So Big but Not So Small Cities in Massachusetts and California

    Open Access•David Chambers, David L Chambers•Law & Social Inquiry•1997

  • Divorce Attorneys and 40 Clients in Two Not So Big but Not So Small Cities in Massachusetts and California

    Open Access•David Chambers, David L Chambers•Law & Social Inquiry•1997

  • Client decision-making in personal injury schemes

    Open Access•Andy Boon•International Journal of the…•1995

  • Roles, ethics and lawyers’ reactions

    Han Xu•Multilingua•2021

  • An Elusive Profession? Lawyers in Society

    Open Access•Miek Berends•Law & Society Review•1992

  • What Do Dutch Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases

    Open Access•Jacob Griffiths, John Griffith et al.•Law & Society Review•1986

  • Case Processing

    Open Access•Susan S Silbey•Law & Society Review•1981

  • Law and Social Relations

    Open Access•Austin Sarat, William L F Felstiner•Law & Society Review•1988

  • Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office

    Open Access•Austin Sarat, William L F Felstiner•Law & Society Review•1986

  • Legal ethnography

    Open Access•Lori Beaman-Hall•Critical Criminology•1996

  • Studying Disputes by Survey

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer, Rebecca E Miller et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•1981

  • Political Language

    Jacob Murray Edelman•Political Language•1977

  • The Communication of Information about Illness

    Open Access•Howard Waitzkin, John D Stoeckle•Psychosocial Aspects of Physical…•2015

  • Medical Nemesis

    Ivan Illich•Health Care Management Review•1977

  • Transcript of Conference Proceedings

    Open Access•Lester Brickman, Richard Lempert et al.•Law & Society Review•1976

  • Language in the Legal Process

    Open Access•Brenda Danet•Law & Society Review•1980

  • Law, Language and Communication

    W Charles, W H Charles et al.•University of Toronto Law Journal•1974

  • Lawyers and Their Work

    Walter E Craig, Walter Craig et al.•Stanford Law Review•1968

  • Lawyer and Client

    Douglas E Rosenthal•Stanford Law Review•1974

  • The Deprofessionalization of Everyone

    Marie R Haug•Sociological Focus•1975

  • Unequal Justice

    Paul L Murphy, Jerold S Auerbach•Journal of American History•1977

  • Invitation to Sociology

    Peter L Berger•Invitation to Sociology•1963

  • Socializing the Legal Profession

    Open Access•Richard L Abel, Richard Abel•Law & Policy•1979

  • Lawyers and Matrimonial Cases

    Arnold M Rose, Hubert J O''Gorman et al.•American Sociological Review•1966

  • Baby' or 'fetus

    Open Access•Brenda Danet•Semiotica•1980

  • Evaluating the Competence of Lawyers

    Open Access•Douglas E Rosenthal•Law & Society Review•1976

  • Measuring the Quality of Legal Services

    Open Access•Rick J Carlson•Law & Society Review•1976

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,29
Citation span1981 - 2023 (43)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae