Collaboration and Commodification in Assisted Procreation
Reflections on an Open Market and Anonymous Donation in Human Sperm and Eggs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4084691 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary Lyndon Shanley (Vassar College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 257-283 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1512177 |
| OpenAlex | W2065789944 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 25 |
The practices through which American society regulates the transfer of human gametes (eggs and sperm) reflects and shapes our understanding of our relationship to our genetic materials. The ways in which we think about and justify these practices engages important themes of liberal political theory and law: the understanding of individuals as autonomous or defined (at least in part) by relationships that entail dependence and care; the meaning of reproductive freedom and procreative collaboration; and the extent to which a free market may protect or undercut individual liberty. Two ethical and policy questions reflect these issues: should persons created with third-party gametes be able to learn the identity of the donor(s), and should the sale of eggs and sperm be prohibited, regulated, or left to the open market? This article contends that society should prohibit both anonymous transfer of and payment for human gametes themselves. Abolition of both anonymity and payment in the practice of gamete transfer is necessary to reflect properly the collaborative nature of assisted procreation. Although political reality may lead society to permit payment of a strictly capped "inconvenience allowance" for undergoing the procedures involved in transferring one's gametes, such payment (while preferable to payment for gametes themselves) inappropriately conceptualizes use of one's body as a commodity
Advertising · Andrology · Biology · Business · Commodification · Donation · Economics · Economy · Egg donation · Embryo · Fishery · Gynecology · Internet privacy · Oocyte · Oocyte donation · Political science · Sperm · Computer Science · Law · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Small is Beautiful
Social and Historic Analysis of Economic Knowledge
Consumer Choice of Retail Formats in Russian Grocery Sector
Globalization and gametes
L’insupportable et l’incertain
Introduction
The Best Interest of The Child as an Argument in Assessments of Parent Potential in Sweden
Definitions of the Family as an Impetus for Legal Change in Custody Decision Making
The beginning of human life at the laboratory
I would want to pay her
Dilemmatic tensions around parenthood
Reproductive Bodies and Bits
Family change and the state of family sociology
| Citations per year | 0.65 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2021 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |