The Durham Rule in Action
Judicial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4085216 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Arens (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 41-80 |
| Publication date | 1967-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3052934 |
| OpenAlex | W2334016940 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Exercising its right to frame a new standard of criminal responsibility, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia declared in Durham v. United States: "An accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect
Action (physics · Criminology · Economic Justice · Forensic psychiatry · Political science · Psychiatry · Child and Adolescent Health · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1974 - 1999 (26) |
| Highly cited | No |