Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead

Bibliographic Data

ID4085481
AuthorsJoel B Grossman (Johns Hopkins University), Herbert M Kritzer, Stewart Macaulay
Year1999
Volume33
Issue4
Pages803-810
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3115150
OpenAlexW1965634730
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited7

In the spring of 1998, the University of Wisconsin Law School sponsored a multidisciplinary conference to assess the impact of perhaps the most visible, widely cited, and influential article ever published in the law and society field: Marc Galanter's (1974) "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." In that article Galanter attempts to explain the outcome of trial court litigation in essentially structural terms. He discusses "the way in which the basic architecture of the legal system creates and limits the possibilities of using the system for redistributive change." Galanter divides parties into "one shotters" and "repeat players." A one shotter is a person, business, or organizational entity that deals with the legal system infrequently. The one shotter's claims are too large (relative to their size) or too small (relative to the cost of remedies) to be managed routinely and rationally, but a one shotter's interest in winning a particular case is very high

Criminology · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies

  • Do Better Lawyers Win More Often? Measures of Advocate Quality and Their Impact in Singapore's Supreme Court

    Open Access•Simon Chesterman•Asian Journal of Comparative Law•2020

  • Who Are You and What’s Your Issue? Winning in Collective Litigation in Colombia

    Open Access•Angela M Páez•Latin American Research Review•2023

  • Public Management’s Problems are Legal Problems

    Open Access•Ben Merriman•Perspectives on Public Management…•2020

  • Ambivalence towards law

    Open Access•Prashan Ranasinghe•International Journal of Law in…•2010

  • Half Empty, Half Full, or Neither

    Open Access•R Stryker•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2007

  • The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest

    Catherine R Albiston, Lauren B Edelman et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • What Legal Culture for the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Jean-Guy Belley, Jean‐guy Belley et al.•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2011

  • Law and the historical geography of the Galilee

    Open Access•Geremy Forman•Journal of Historical Geography•2006

  • The Quality of Democracy

    Open Access•Guillermo O’donnell•Journal of democracy•2004

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • A Built-In Advantage

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Why the “Haves” Do Not Necessarily Come Out Ahead in Informal Dispute Resolution

    Open Access•Sharon Gilad•Law & Policy•2010

  • Shifting Frames, Vanishing Resources, and Dangerous Political Opportunities

    Open Access•Julieta Lemaitre, Kristin Bergtora Sandvik•Law & Society Review•2015

  • Law, Democracy, and Domination

    Open Access•Robert L Nelson•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Situated Justice

    Open Access•Ellen Berrey, Steve G Hoffman et al.•Law & Society Review•2012

  • Repeat Players, the Law, and Social Change

    Open Access•Annabel Ipsen•Law & Society Review•2020

  • The Rights Revolution

    Charles R Epp•Rights Revolution•1998

  • Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law

    Robert H Mnookin, Lewis A Kornhauser et al.•The Yale Law Journal•1979

  • The politics of rights

    Stuart A Scheingold, Stuart Scheingold•The politics of rights•2004

  • The Small Claims Court

    Open Access•Neil Vidmar•Law & Society Review•1984

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • The Infrastructure for Avoiding Civil Litigation

    Open Access•Erhard Blankenburg•Law & Society Review•1994

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2001 - 2023 (23)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae