Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paris Is Closer than Frankfurt

The nth American Exceptionalism

Bibliographic Data

ID4085482
AuthorsKenneth Casebeer, Kenneth M Casebeer (corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume28
Issue4
Pages931-937
Publication date1994-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3054002
OpenAlexW2324141885
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited10

James Bohman's review (1994) contributes to an important goal for the American legal academy: bringing to us the recent focus on the role of law in society of Jürgen Habermas and, by extension, contemporary Frankfurt School social theory. These comments attempt to locate Habermas broadly in three discursive contexts. My purpose will be to suggestively examine whether and how the American legal reception of Habermasian ideas has been limited-the implicit rationale being that the reception is overdue. With almost all discussion of Habermas and law taking place in Europe, it seems we must ask, Why is there no [German] social theory in America, or at least in American law? After all, the United States became the home in exile for the Frankfurt survivors, and Habermas has been writing influentially in philosophy and political theory for more than 30 years. Yet, for reasons not altogether different from the revision and partial rejection of the other American exceptionalisms (socialism, labor politics, class formations, etc.), perhaps the question in fact should be more about the particularity of American treatment of the role of law in the reproduction of society than about Habermas and his ideas

American exceptionalism · Criminology · Exceptionalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · European Political History Analysis · Law · Political Theory and Influence

  • Law, Policymaking, and the Policy Process

    Open Access•Stephen Barclay, Scott Barclay et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1998

  • A guide to critical legal studies

    Mark Kelman•A guide to critical legal studies•1987

  • Law's Republic

    Frank I Michelman, Frank Michelman•The Yale Law Journal•1988

  • Social Justice in the Liberal State

    Bruce Ackerman, Bruce A Ackerman•Social Justice in the Liberal State•2017

  • Civil Society and Political Theory

    Jean L Cohen, Andrew Arato•Democracy•2016

  • The Question That Killed Critical Legal Studies

    Open Access•Richard Michael Fischl•Law & Social Inquiry•1992

  • Interest Groups in American Public Law

    Cass R Sunstein•Stanford Law Review•1985

  • Notes toward an Intimate, Opinionated, and Affectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies

    John Henry Schlegel•Stanford Law Review•1984

  • Structuralism and Critique

    Thomas Heller, Thomas C Heller•Stanford Law Review•1984

  • Civil society and political theory

    Andrew Arato, Jean Louis Cohen•Civil society and political theory•1992

  • Between Facts and Norms

    Jürgen Habermas•Between Facts and Norms•1996

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1998 - 1998 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae