Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Conquest, Clientage, and Land Law Among the Luo of Kenya

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4085692
AutoresAmos O Odenyo (autor correspondente)
Ano1973
Volume7
Fascículo4
Páginas767-778
Data de publicação1973-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3052969
OpenAlexW2171371568
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas7

In the process of nation building, the new African nations are confronted with the need to establish legal systems which would perpetuate some selected traditions while, at the same time, are appropriate enough to solve the current untraditional problems. Under colonial rule. Western legal concepts dominated some areas of life while customary laws dominated the other spheres. Criminal law, the law of torts, contracts, administrative laws, taxation, company law, road traffic and copyright laws, were dominated by Western legal concepts. Customary legal concepts were operative in the fields of land tenure, marriage, divorce, succession and guardianship. The dual legal system served respectively the colonial and the native social order. With the demise of colonial rule, African legal systems now suffer from a schizophrenic posture, torn between tradition and modernity. The schizophrenia is more painful now that the new indigenous rulers, raised in the traditional ways, use modern, often colonial government structures to govern a population still tradition-directed. In this process of governing, the dictates of a modern state often clash with tradition. One such clash occurred in April 1968, when Kenya law makers used a modern legislature to pass a Limitation of Action Act (Kenya Gazette Supplement Acts, No. 34, 1968: 310), an act which proved unpopular despite the convincing arguments in its favor. This paper explores the conflicts between modernity and tradition engendered by the passage of the Act and exemplified by the effects of the Act on the Luo social structure, especially with regard to land ownership and status relationships. The question posed is: How appropriate is law as an instrument of social change, especially in a traditional cultural milieu? Can the nation state rely on law to change its tradition-oriented rural localities? Evidence elsewhere (Massell, 1968: 179) reveals that the law as an instrument of change often yields unintended and unpleasant consequences

Ancient history · CONQUEST · Geography · Political science · African history and culture analysis · History · Land Rights and Reforms · Law

  • African States and Agriculture

    Open Access•Martha Gephart, Martha A Gephart•IDS Bulletin•1986

  • The unintended consequences of increased access to justice

    Open Access•Whitney K Taylor•Law & Society Review•2025

  • Political Leadership and Legal Change in Zinacantan

    Open Access•Jane F Collier•Law & Society Review•1976

  • Judicial Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa

    Karen A Mingst•African Studies Review•1988

  • Luo entrustment

    Open Access•Parker Shipton•Africa•1995

  • Law and Social Change in the New Nations

    Open Access•Lawrence Rosen•Comparative Studies in Society…•1978

  • African Penal Systems

    Leonard C Kercher, Alan Milner•American Sociological Review•1970

  • Law as an Instrument of Revolutionary Change in a Traditional Milieu

    Open Access•Gregory J Massell•Law & Society Review•1968

  • Social Stratification in Africa

    Penelope Roach, Arthur Tuden et al.•American Sociological Review•1971

  • Social Stratification in Africa

    Leonard Reissman, Arthur Tuden et al.•Social Forces•1971

  • Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society

    Max Rheinstein, Edward Shils•Harvard Law Review•1955

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano0,12
Intervalo de citações1976 - 2025 (50)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae