Another Form of American Exceptionalism? A Comparative Analysis of Terrorism Sting Operations in the US and Abroad
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4086693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James J Norris (0000-0002-0326-9668, Criminal Justice, State University of New York at Fredonia, Fredonia, New York, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1399-1423 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546553.2019.1613984 |
| OpenAlex | W2956902545 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Sting operations can potentially thwart terrorist plots, but could also threaten civil liberties and alienate communities, making them a critical subject for counterterrorism research. Yet despite considerable research on U.S. cases, little is known about terrorism stings elsewhere. How common are such cases abroad, and how many feature strong entrapment claims or result in entrapment-related acquittals? In this study, data are gathered about non-U.S. terrorism stings, each of which is evaluated for entrapment indicators. Results show that, contrary to claims of American exceptionalism, terrorism stings could be identified in twenty-one countries, and the average number of entrapment indicators per case is similar between the U.S. and several countries. In addition, several non-U.S. cases present entrapment claims as strong as some of the most-criticized U.S. cases. However, relatively few non-U.S. terrorism stings (fifty-one) could be identified, while there are 156 U.S. cases. In addition, unlike in the U.S., courts have acquitted defendants on entrapment grounds in a high proportion of non-U.S. cases. Political, cultural, and legal differences between the U.S. and other countries, and certain cross-national commonalities, are identified as likely accounting for these results. Potential implications of these findings for terrorism prevention and legal reform are considered
American exceptionalism · Civil liberties · Criminology · Entrapment · Exceptionalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Terrorism · Gun Ownership and Violence Research · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |