The Role of Basic Psychological Needs in Right-Wing Extremism Risk Among American Conservatives

Bibliographic Data

ID4086928
AuthorsJeremy J J Rappel (0000-0002-7838-1187, McGill University, corresponding author), David D Vachon (0000-0003-2852-0262, McGill University)
Year2024
Volume36
Issue4
Pages533-551
Publication date2024-05-18
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTerrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09546553.2023.2178305
OpenAlexW4323838229
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Modern psychological theories of violent extremism stress the roles of social connections and personal meaning as motivators for individuals to participate in extremist groups. Personal meaning and social connections are both important aspects of Basic Psychological Needs Theory, a motivation framework commonly used in workplace and educational psychology. This study sought to assess the relationship between Basic Psychological Needs and extremism among (N = 361) self-identified American conservatives. Psychological Need fulfilment was strongly negatively associated with endorsement of extremism (range of rs = −.43 to −.68). In addition, Psychological Need fulfilment explained incremental variance in extremism scores after accounting for other psychological characteristics, including aggression, psychopathy, empathy, and Five-Factor Model personality traits. These findings suggest that Basic Psychological Needs may be a useful framework to expand our understanding of the etiology of extremism, and that prosocial alternatives for meeting these needs may reduce the risk of engaging in extremist behaviors

Criminology · Political science · Politics · Right wing · Terrorism · Violent extremism · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Tools

Open DOI