Counter-terrorism and commercial interests
Do they conflict
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4087194 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gil Feiler (Middle East Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 15-22 |
| Publication date | 1998-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546559808427455 |
| OpenAlex | W2090490076 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
This paper concentrates on whether there is an inherent conflict between commercial interests and the fight against state‐sponsored terrorism.1 It examines the differences between US and EU policy, particularly in relation to Iran; the roles of Russia and China and the wider impact of international responses. The author concludes that symbolic sanctions and sporadic dialogue are completely inadequate instruments, but that genuine international sanctions and critical dialogue should not be viewed as mutually exclusive policy instruments
China · Criminology · Foreign policy · International conflict · International relations · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sanctions · Sociology · Terrorism · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |