Far-Right Extremism
Is it Legitimate Freedom of Expression, Hate Crime, or Terrorism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4087661 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Lowe (0000-0003-1356-3665, Leeds Law School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1433-1453 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546553.2020.1789111 |
| OpenAlex | W3041285171 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Following the rise in far-right inspired terrorist attacks globally, social media and electronic communications companies have been criticized, mainly by politicians, for allowing far-right extremist content to be available. This article is a comparative legal study focusing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S.’ legal provisions regarding the right to freedom of expression, hate crime, and proscription of terrorist organizations. This study found a disparity in the form of expression protected under this right. This disparity widens further when related to hate crime and proscribing groups as terrorist organizations. As such, social media and communications companies have difficulty setting at global level a baseline in determining whether content is legitimate commentary or is extremism promoting or inciting hatred and violence. The article concludes with a recommendation for how states can provide comparable legislation on hate crime as they have done in relation to Islamist inspired extremism. This will assist social media and communications companies in removing content and suspending accounts. These companies are not the guardians of freedom of expression, that is the role of states’ legislatures and judiciary
Criminology · Freedom of expression · Freedom of the press · Hatred · Human rights · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Proscription · Radicalization · Social media · Sociology · Terrorism · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Linguistic models of abusive language
Where the far-right is not
Examining the Ideological Foundations, Psychological Influences, and Media Representation of Extremism and Its Social Impact
Thematic analysis of in-group and out-group debates in an online right-wing extremist community
Like a chess game
The visual and rhetorical styles of Atomwaffen Division and their implications
A gathering storm
A Conceptual Framework to Map Responses to Hate Crime, Hate Incidents and Hate Speech
Mnemonic normalisation in the visual politics of the German far-right
| Citations per year | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |