Object extraction is not subject to Child Relativized Minimality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4093973 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helen Goodluck (0000-0001-5158-645X) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1516-1521 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Lingua (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3841 • E-ISSN: 1872-6135 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.10.005 |
| OpenAlex | W1988401847 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 7 |
Grammar · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Object (grammar · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Mathematics · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Reading and Literacy Development · Artificial Intelligence
How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish
The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses
Resumptive elements aid comprehension of object relative clauses
Not committing has its advantages
How do 5-year-olds understand questions? Differences in languages across Europe
Comprehension of who - and which -questions in monolingual and bilingual acquisition
Chinese Children’s Knowledge of Topicalization
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,58 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |