Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Challenging equivalency in measures of English language proficiency for university admission

Data From an Undergraduate Engineering Programme

Bibliographic Data

ID4096617
AuthorsM Gregory Tweedie (0000-0003-0497-4577, University of Calgary, corresponding author), Man-Wai Chu (0000-0001-9655-7791, University of Calgary)
Year2019
Volume44
Issue4
Pages683-695
Publication date2019-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Higher Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03075079.2017.1395008
OpenAlexW2766454785
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited18

English is increasingly common as a medium of instruction in higher education internationally, and evidence of English language proficiency (ELP) forms a vital aspect of many post-secondary admission applications. Scores from different ELP measures (e.g. standardized assessments; institution-specific English programmes) are often used as equivalent assessment of language skills for admission, yet little research exists to show equivalency to one another. This study examines three measures of ELP used for post-secondary admission: scores from IELTS, TOEFL, and an institution-specific academic English programme, relative to course grade results, and student retention rates in a first-year undergraduate engineering programme. Statistically significant differences were found between the three types of ELP assessment with respect to academic success. Furthermore, students admitted using the academic English programme showed a statistically significantly higher rate of first-year programme dropout. These findings call into question the assumption of equivalency among measures of ELP used for post-secondary admission

College English · Higher education · Language assessment · Language proficiency · Mathematics education · Medical education · Political science · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Medicine · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • “IELTS-out/Toefl-out”

    Open Access•Robert C Johnson, M Gregory Tweedie•Interchange•2021

  • Comparison of Chinese and Western English language proficiency measures in transnational business degrees

    Alan Farley, Helen Yang et al.•Language Culture and Curriculum•2019

  • Language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge, and individual factors in predicting academic achievement

    Open Access•Phat Hong Cao, Csaba Zoltan Szabo et al.•Applied Linguistics Review•2026

  • Pre-admission EAP course completion as evidence of English language proficiency for university admission

    Open Access•Khaled Barkaoui, Jason Holmes et al.•Journal of English for Academic…•2025

  • Education at a Glance 2016

    Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, OECD OECD•Education at a Glance 2016 OECD…•2016

  • English for Specific Purposes

    Open Access•Tom A Hutchinson, Tom Hutchinson et al.•English for Specific Purposes•1987

  • Clil

    Open Access•Do Coyle, Philip Hood et al.•CLIL Cambridge Core EBook•2010

  • English for Academic Purposes

    K Hyland, Hyland Hyland•English Acad Purp Advanc Res Bk•2006

  • Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores

    Open Access•Michael T Kane•Journal of Educational Measurement•2013

  • Relationship of Toefl iBT® scores to academic performance

    Open Access•Yeonsuk Cho, Brent Bridgeman•Language Testing•2012

  • Content-Based Language Instruction

    Marguerite Ann Snow, Donna M Brinton•TESOL Quarterly•1988

  • Student writing in higher education

    Mary R Lea, Brian Street et al.•Studies in Higher Education•1998

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,57
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae