The effect on science of government cuts to doctoral scholarships
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4098043 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Giulia Rossello (0000-0003-1147-8459, University of Pisa, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 1-19 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-03-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075079.2025.2484656 |
| OpenAlex | W4409034352 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 52 |
The ‘there are too many PhDs’ debate lacks evidence on the consequences of reducing the number of PhDs. This paper provides causal estimates of the impact on STEM students of cuts to government-funded PhD scholarships based on a unique quasi-natural experiment. I use data on the staggered cuts made by the Hungarian Government between 2010 and 2021 to expand Orbàn’s political influence over the university system. The political aim of these cuts ensures that they are exogenous to the economic cycle and universities’ evolution. The analysis uses the enrolment records of all doctoral students in Hungary and employs a generalized difference-in-differences approach. The results show that a severe cut to PhD scholarships increases the chance of PhD completion by 1 percentage point (pp) but that this positive effect is countered by a persistent and growing reduction in female and first-generation student entry rates. This suggests that while they might result in improved training and/or a more efficient education system, cuts to scholarships will come at the expense of inclusion. Additionally, the findings indicate that the negative impact on scientific production is temporary, with doctoral student productivity decreasing by 2pp and the quality of scientific output declining by 0.2–1pp. My results highlight these tradeoffs. Cuts to funding that reduce the numbers of PhD scholarships might increase efficiency in terms of student attainment but are likely to reduce inclusion, scientific production, and research quality
Economic growth · Economics · Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Innovation Policy and RD · Medicine · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
How Economics Shapes Science
On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge
Human Capital and Regional Development
Too Many PhD Graduates or Too Few Academic Job Openings
Education
A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry
PhD job market
Academic Entrepreneurs
Mobility versus job stability
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects
The Role of Early-Career University Prestige Stratification on the Future Academic Performance of Scholars
How much does a Ph.D. scholarship program impact an emerging economy research performance
The expansion of doctoral education and the changing nature and purpose of the doctorate
The role of higher education centres in research and policy
Public Universities
Masking the Strangulation of Opposition Parties as Pandemic Response
You Can Have It All, Just Not at the Same Time”
Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research
Is a PhD worth more than a Master's in the UK labour market? The role of specialisation and managerial position
The Shaping of Higher Education
Features of Educational Attainment and Job Promotion Prospects
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |