Racionalidad de la acción y racionalidad de la teoría (Rationality of Action and Rationality of Theory)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4124549 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Javier Cristiano (0000-0001-5731-7269, corresponding author), Javier L Cristiano |
| Year | 2006 |
| Issue | 113 |
| Pages | 135 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0210-5233 • E-ISSN: 1988-5903 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/40184728 |
| OpenAlex | W2324297379 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
This article offers a critical analysis of the four central arguments with which the rational choice theory cla ms to be a privileged methodological instrument of sociology: the «reasonable presumption» argument outlined by Elster, the «paradigmatic privilege» of Abell, the «integrating framework» of van Parijs and the explanatory strength of Freedman and Becker. After presenting these, a brief approach is made to the problem of the possibility of a theoretical construction that is capable of making a complex approach at the level of actions that is compatible with one that is complex at the level of «aggregates
Action (physics · Epistemology · Physics · Rationality · Sociology · Agricultural and Food Production Studies · Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Public Policy and Governance
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |