Projected Futures
The Political Matter of UK Higher Activity Radioactive Waste
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4140355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicky Gregson (0000-0002-2796-389X, Durham University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 2006-2022 |
| Publication date | 2012-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/a44600 |
| OpenAlex | W2043653884 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 37 |
This paper identifies, and works from, the technoconceptual as a site of intervention for a politics of stuff. Its case is radioactive waste: specifically, UK higher activity wastes (HAW) and the policy future of a UK Deep Geological Disposal Facility (DGF). The paper proceeds through three steps. It charts, first, the unravelling of HAW as onto-politics through the democratisation of technoscience, showing that, as the gap between stuff and politics has opened, HAW's future in a DGF has become the preserve of science-technical discourses (currently geology and engineered design). Secondly, it joins with the undone-science traditions of STS (science, technology, and society), to critique existing technoscientific conceptualisations of a DGF and to anticipate a future in which a DGF is abandoned. Third, and in response to abandonment, it proposes a different future for a DGF. This starts from thinking radioactive waste as 'thing power' but argues that, for a DGF to be materialised in ways that forge attachments with publics, requires a turn to material culture. More broadly, the paper argues that furthering ontopolitics requires keeping the demos alive to stuff's vitality. This means engaging in political settlements of technoscientific controversies; with old, or established, technologies, and 'cold' politics; and in politics as practised
Abandonment (legal · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social science · Sociology · Technoscience · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Risk Perception and Management · Law
Decommissioning as Residual Care
Performativity and a microbe
Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste
Social sciences and radioactive waste management
Place and Defilement
Safer-than
For a familiar future
Dis/appearing waste and afterwards
Earthly graves for environmental futures
Because We've Got History Here
Environmental Justice as Scalar Parity
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry
Deliberative mapping
Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate
Woodland burial
In the shadow of the traditional grave
Framing nuclear waste as a political issue in France
The Swedish KBS project
Just science? Organizing scientist activism in the US environmental justice movement
Underlying Yucca Mountain
Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity
Hurricane Katrina, contamination, and the unintended organization of ignorance
Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making
The Force of Things
Managing the Experience of Evidence
Undone Science
The Secret of Yucca Mountain
Alien Still Life
Meddling in Swedish success in nuclear waste management
Power Relations
Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation
A Cosmogram for Nuclear Things
Politiques de la nature
Politics of Nature
Vibrant Matter
The Unknown in Process
The Potentials and Limitations of Civil Society Research
Art-Science
Mapping deliberation
The anti-political economy
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,79 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |