Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4142302 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guido Vonk (Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Stan Geertman (0000-0002-8824-0484, Urban and Regional Research Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Uretcht, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Paul Schot (Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands), P P Schot (0000-0002-0346-0737, Utrecht University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 909-924 |
| Publication date | 2005-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/a3712 |
| OpenAlex | W2139050686 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 62 |
| References cited | 34 |
Research on planning support systems (PSS) is characterized by a strong emphasis on the supply side, whereas little research has been undertaken on the successes and failures in the adoption of PSS within the planning community (demand side). What becomes clear from the existing research is that usage is not widespread. In this paper we aim to find the main bottlenecks blocking the widespread use of PSS in spatial planning. To achieve this, a global online survey was conducted in which almost 100 PSS experts participated and for which a theoretical framework from the field of business studies served as a basis. The results show that a multitude of factors cause the underutilization of PSS, their characteristics being human, organizational and institutional, as well as technical. In particular, the lack of awareness of and experience with PSS, alongside the relative lack of recognition of the value of PSS within the spatial planning community, tend to block widespread usage and adoption of PSS in planning practice. On this basis, we offer recommendations for the enhancement of PSS adoption, namely to disseminate more profoundly information and knowledge about the existence and benefits of PSS within the spatial planning community. Real-world example projects and in-depth research on potential benefits of PSS application in planning practice will be crucial in this
Business · Dissemination · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Multitude · Political science · Process management · Spatial planning · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Transportation and Mobility Innovations
GIS-based landscape design research
Urban Planning
Bridging Research and Practice
Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices
Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning
Evaluating a Workflow Tool for Simplifying Scenario Planning with the Online WhatIf? Planning Support System
Towards Supporting Collaborative Spatial Planning
Understanding Planning Support Systems Institutionalization in the Planning Process Through Actor–Network Theory
Is a New ‘Planning 3.0’ Paradigm Emerging? Exploring the Relationship between Digital Technologies and Planning Theory and Practice
Are planners ready for a digital transformation? An exploration of digital planning tools and urban planners’ confidence using ICTs
Embedding planning support systems in spatial planning practice
A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology
Free and open source urbanism
From PSScience to digital planning
A framework to bridge digital planning tools' utilization gap in peri-urban spatial planning; lessons from Pakistan
Ignorance is bliss? An empirical analysis of the determinants of PSS usefulness in practice
Life is a scene and we are the actors
Digital Technology Use and Future Expectations
The prospects for the implementation of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in participatory decision-making in local governments in Poland
Open-source planning support system for sustainable regional planning
Development of a planning support system to evaluate transit-oriented development masterplan concepts for optimal health outcomes
Planning support science
Lessons for developing a planning support system infrastructure
What does urban informatics add to planning support technology
Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems
Assessing collaborative planning and the added value of planning support apps in The Netherlands
An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago
A new toolkit for land value analysis and scenario planning
Place-bound planning support systems for deliberation
Breaking down the silos through geodesign – Envisioning Sydney’s urban future
Scaling up Leed-ND sustainability assessment from the neighborhood towards the city scale with the support of GIS modeling
Planning support systems for smart cities
Too complicated and impractical? An exploratory study on the role of energy system models in municipal decision-making processes in Denmark
A SWOT analysis of smart governance applications amid the Covid-19 pandemic
Attention economics, artificial intelligence, and the future of the planning profession
Building effective Planning Support Systems for green urban water infrastructure—Practitioners’ perceptions
A user perspective on the gap between science and decision-making. Local administrators’ views on expert knowledge in urban planning
Location of logistics companies
Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene
Artificial Intelligence-Aided and Data-Driven Design (Aidd) for Participatory Urban Design Computation
Participatory Development of Planning Support Systems to Improve Empowerment and Localization
Co-Designing Planning Support Systems in Urban Science
Does Mobility Experience Matter? Insights from a Model-Oriented Practice in Zaragoza, Spain
Urban Chatter
Process first, tools second
Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process
Digital planning practices
Guidelines for computational modelling of planning obligation negotiations
Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making
New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies
A territorial approach to assess the transition to trellis vineyards in special protection areas for steppe birds in Spain
Environmental impact assessment in urban transport planning
A window on urban sustainability
Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice
Towards sustainable settlement growth
Cervical Cancer Screening in a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic
Automatic for the people? Problematising the potential of digital planning
A ssessing the implementation of Ontario's Nutrient Management decision support system
The use of urban analytics in strategic planning – A case study of the greater Sydney region plan
Does co-development facilitate achieving useful planning tools? A socio-technical approach to the development of information model-based land use planning in Finland
Inclusive Digital Planning – Co-designing a collaborative mapping tool to support the planning of accessible public space for all
New Divisions of Digital Labour in Architecture
The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use
Organizational innovation adoption
Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Personal Computing
UrbanSim
Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail
Predicting User Intentions
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Planning Support Systems
Locational Models, Geographic Information and Planning Support Systems
"Where has the Future Gone?" Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning
| Unique citing works | 62 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,26 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 61 |