Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems

Bibliographic Data

ID4142302
AuthorsGuido Vonk (Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Stan Geertman (0000-0002-8824-0484, Urban and Regional Research Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Uretcht, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Paul Schot (Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands), P P Schot (0000-0002-0346-0737, Utrecht University, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume37
Issue5
Pages909-924
Publication date2005-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1068/a3712
OpenAlexW2139050686
LanguageEN
Citations received62
References cited34

Research on planning support systems (PSS) is characterized by a strong emphasis on the supply side, whereas little research has been undertaken on the successes and failures in the adoption of PSS within the planning community (demand side). What becomes clear from the existing research is that usage is not widespread. In this paper we aim to find the main bottlenecks blocking the widespread use of PSS in spatial planning. To achieve this, a global online survey was conducted in which almost 100 PSS experts participated and for which a theoretical framework from the field of business studies served as a basis. The results show that a multitude of factors cause the underutilization of PSS, their characteristics being human, organizational and institutional, as well as technical. In particular, the lack of awareness of and experience with PSS, alongside the relative lack of recognition of the value of PSS within the spatial planning community, tend to block widespread usage and adoption of PSS in planning practice. On this basis, we offer recommendations for the enhancement of PSS adoption, namely to disseminate more profoundly information and knowledge about the existence and benefits of PSS within the spatial planning community. Real-world example projects and in-depth research on potential benefits of PSS application in planning practice will be crucial in this

Business · Dissemination · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Multitude · Political science · Process management · Spatial planning · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Transportation and Mobility Innovations

  • GIS-based landscape design research

    Open Access•Steffen Nijhui, Steffen Nijhuis•Architecture and the Built…•2017

  • Urban Planning

    Open Access•RICHARD E KLOSTERMAN•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices

    Open Access•Maarit Kahila-Tani, Marketta Kyttä et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2019

  • Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Wesley Flannery, Noel Healy et al.•Marine Policy•2018

  • Evaluating a Workflow Tool for Simplifying Scenario Planning with the Online WhatIf? Planning Support System

    Open Access•Muhammad Qadeer ul Hussnain, Abdul Waheed et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Towards Supporting Collaborative Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Rosa Aguilar, Johannes Flacke et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Understanding Planning Support Systems Institutionalization in the Planning Process Through Actor–Network Theory

    Open Access•Deborah Adeola Oyeku, L G J Boerboom et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2025

  • Is a New ‘Planning 3.0’ Paradigm Emerging? Exploring the Relationship between Digital Technologies and Planning Theory and Practice

    Ruth Potts•Planning Theory & Practice•2020

  • Are planners ready for a digital transformation? An exploration of digital planning tools and urban planners’ confidence using ICTs

    Open Access•Brian Webb, Ruth Potts•International Planning Studies•2025

  • Embedding planning support systems in spatial planning practice

    Open Access•Deborah Adeola Oyeku, Luc Boerboom et al.•International Planning Studies•2024

  • A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology

    Open Access•Ruth Potts, Dan Milz•International Planning Studies•2024

  • Free and open source urbanism

    Open Access•Winston Yap, Patrick Janssen et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2022

  • From PSScience to digital planning

    Open Access•Stan Geertman, Patrick Witte•Computers Environment and Urban…•2024

  • A framework to bridge digital planning tools' utilization gap in peri-urban spatial planning; lessons from Pakistan

    Open Access•Muhammad Qadeer ul Hussnain, Abdul Waheed et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2020

  • Ignorance is bliss? An empirical analysis of the determinants of PSS usefulness in practice

    Open Access•Huaxiong Jiang, Stan Geertman et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2020

  • Life is a scene and we are the actors

    Open Access•Ep Punt, E P Punt et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2020

  • Digital Technology Use and Future Expectations

    Claire Daniel, Elizabeth A Wentz et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2024

  • The prospects for the implementation of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in participatory decision-making in local governments in Poland

    Open Access•Edyta Bąkowska-Waldmann•Geographia Polonica•2025

  • Open-source planning support system for sustainable regional planning

    Open Access•Jessica Page, Ulla Mörtberg et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2020

  • Development of a planning support system to evaluate transit-oriented development masterplan concepts for optimal health outcomes

    Open Access•Paul Hooper, Julian Bolleter et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2022

  • Planning support science

    Open Access•Stan Geertman, John Stillwell•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2020

  • Lessons for developing a planning support system infrastructure

    Open Access•Robert Goodspeed, Cassie Hackel•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2019

  • What does urban informatics add to planning support technology

    Open Access•Haozhi Pan, Stan Geertman et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2020

  • Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems

    Open Access•Claire Daniel, Christopher Pettit•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2022

  • Assessing collaborative planning and the added value of planning support apps in The Netherlands

    Open Access•Yanliu Lin, Kasper Benneker•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2022

  • An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago

    Open Access•Haozhi Pan, Si Chen et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2020

  • A new toolkit for land value analysis and scenario planning

    Open Access•Christopher Pettit, Vivien Shi et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2020

  • Place-bound planning support systems for deliberation

    Open Access•Raz Weiner, Filipe Mello Rose et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2024

  • Breaking down the silos through geodesign – Envisioning Sydney’s urban future

    Open Access•Christopher Pettit, Christopher J Pettit et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2019

  • Scaling up Leed-ND sustainability assessment from the neighborhood towards the city scale with the support of GIS modeling

    Open Access•Joana Pedro, Carlos Silva et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2018

  • Planning support systems for smart cities

    Open Access•Christopher Pettit, Ashley Bakelmun et al.•City Culture and Society•2018

  • Too complicated and impractical? An exploratory study on the role of energy system models in municipal decision-making processes in Denmark

    Open Access•Sara Ben Amer, Jay Sterling Gregg et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • A SWOT analysis of smart governance applications amid the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Huaxiong Jiang•Information Polity•2022

  • Attention economics, artificial intelligence, and the future of the planning profession

    Open Access•J Metzger•Planning Theory•2025

  • Building effective Planning Support Systems for green urban water infrastructure—Practitioners’ perceptions

    Open Access•Martijn Kuller, Megan Farrelly et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • A user perspective on the gap between science and decision-making. Local administrators’ views on expert knowledge in urban planning

    Open Access•Rien van Stigt, Peter Driessen et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2014

  • Location of logistics companies

    Open Access•Ann Verhetsel, Roselinde Kessels et al.•Journal of Transport Geography•2015

  • Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, John A Dearing et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Artificial Intelligence-Aided and Data-Driven Design (Aidd) for Participatory Urban Design Computation

    Open Access•Steven J Quan•Journal of Planning Education and…•2026

  • Participatory Development of Planning Support Systems to Improve Empowerment and Localization

    Haozhi Pan, Yoonshin Kwak et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2022

  • Co-Designing Planning Support Systems in Urban Science

    Markus Rittenbruch, Marcus Foth et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2021

  • Does Mobility Experience Matter? Insights from a Model-Oriented Practice in Zaragoza, Spain

    Open Access•A Ruiz, María Blasco-Cubas et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2023

  • Urban Chatter

    Open Access•Huaxiong Jiang, Mengjuan Li et al.•Cities•2025

  • Process first, tools second

    Open Access•Juliana E Gonçalves, Geertje Slingerland et al.•Cities•2025

  • Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process

    Maarit Kahila-Tani, Anna Broberg et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2016

  • Digital planning practices

    Ruth Potts, Brian Webb•Planning Practice and Research•2023

  • Guidelines for computational modelling of planning obligation negotiations

    Open Access•Aya Badawy, Rebecca Kingston et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2025

  • Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making

    Open Access•Marco Te Brömmelstroet, Luca Bertolini•Transportation•2010

  • New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies

    Open Access•Guido Vonk, Stan Geertman et al.•Public Administration Review•2007

  • A territorial approach to assess the transition to trellis vineyards in special protection areas for steppe birds in Spain

    Open Access•Francisco Montero García, Antonio Brasa Ramos et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Environmental impact assessment in urban transport planning

    Open Access•Julio A Soria-Lara, Luca Bertolini et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015

  • A window on urban sustainability

    Rien van Stigt, Peter P J Driessen et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2013

  • Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice

    Open Access•Hens Runhaar•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2016

  • Towards sustainable settlement growth

    Open Access•Sophie Schetke, Dwight Haase et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2012

  • Cervical Cancer Screening in a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic

    Beth E Meyerson, M Aaron Sayegh et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • Automatic for the people? Problematising the potential of digital planning

    Open Access•Ruth Potts, Alex Lord et al.•Urban Studies•2024

  • A ssessing the implementation of Ontario's Nutrient Management decision support system

    Open Access•Daniel F Walters, Dan Shrubsole•Canadian Geographies /…•2014

  • The use of urban analytics in strategic planning – A case study of the greater Sydney region plan

    Open Access•Claire Daniel, Christopher Pettit et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2025

  • Does co-development facilitate achieving useful planning tools? A socio-technical approach to the development of information model-based land use planning in Finland

    Open Access•Pilvi Nummi, Anni Hapuoja•Computers Environment and Urban…•2025

  • Inclusive Digital Planning – Co-designing a collaborative mapping tool to support the planning of accessible public space for all

    Open Access•Johannes Flacke, Fenna Imara Hoefsloot et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2025

  • New Divisions of Digital Labour in Architecture

    Open Access•Nicole Gardner•Feminist Review•2019

  • The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use

    Open Access•Elena Karahanna, Detmar W Straub•Information & Management•1999

  • Organizational innovation adoption

    Open Access•R T Frambach, Niels Schillewaert•Journal of Business Research•2002

  • Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs

    Open Access•Mark T Dishaw, Diane M Strong•Information & Management•1999

  • Personal Computing

    Ronald L Thompson, Christopher A Higgins et al.•MIS Quarterly•1991

  • UrbanSim

    Paul Waddell•Journal of the American Planning…•2002

  • Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail

    Open Access•Joseph Schmitz, Janet Fulk•Communication Research•1991

  • Predicting User Intentions

    Kieran Mathieson•Information Systems Research•1991

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Management Science•2000

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Planning Support Systems

    Open Access•RICHARD E KLOSTERMAN•Journal of Planning Education and…•1997

  • Locational Models, Geographic Information and Planning Support Systems

    Open Access•Britton Harris, Michael Batty•Journal of Planning Education and…•1993

  • "Where has the Future Gone?" Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Helen Couclelis•Environment and Planning A…•2005

Unique citing works62
Citations per year3,26
Citation span2007 - 2026 (20)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 61
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae