Adaptable state-controlled market actors
Underwriters and investors in the market of local government bonds in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4142537 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhenfa Li (0000-0001-5805-9804, The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, UK, corresponding author), Fulong Wu (0000-0003-4938-6066, The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, UK), Fangzhu Zhang (0000-0002-8975-5324, The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, UK) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 2088-2107 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0308518x231174023 |
| OpenAlex | W4375867219 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 60 |
Local government bonds (LGBs) have become the most important tool of the Chinese state for financing infrastructure projects. The underwriters and investors in LGBs are mostly commercial banks, with state actors holding the overwhelming majority of shares. We call these state-controlled market actors. This article investigates the role of state-controlled market actors in LGB issuance to extend the understanding of state actors and state-market relations in the financialisation of urban governance. The findings show that they underwrite and invest in LGBs to support the government's development objectives and make profits. They can hardly affect the government to create the terms and conditions of bonds to favour their financial interests, but they manage to make substantial profits. They follow the policy trends to identify LGBs as risk-free and reflexively change their investment priority towards the bonds. Due to the low interest rates, the banks mainly profit from bond trading in the secondary market and fiscal fund investment. There are preferential policies for LGB trading in the secondary market, and local governments deposit fiscal funds in the banks to motivate them to do LGB business. We argue that reflexively making investment decisions according to the policy environment and making profits by exploiting political resources represented by preferential policies and fiscal funds show the adaptability of the state-controlled market actors
Bond · Business · China · Corporate governance · Economics · Financial system · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Underwriting · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Public-Private Partnership Projects · State Capitalism and Financial Governance · Finance
A Geographical Approach to China’s Local Government Debt
From Growth Regimes to Housing Production Failures
Power dynamics and spatiality in the financialisation of the city
Urban financialization in the shadow of the resource-constrained system
Selective scaling through ideational alignment
A move towards regulation flexibility and pragmatism? State entrepreneurialism in China’s pilot development zone
Financial Centers and Service Hinterlands
Turning land into assets
Financialising City Statecraft and Infrastructure
Reinventing State Capitalism
State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies
The financing of local government in China
Financialization of, not by the State. Exploring Changes in the Management of Public Debt and Assets across Europe
Varieties of urban entrepreneurialism
A very geographical crisis
Derivatives and the financialisation of the Italian state
Policy-making and Political Supervision in Shanghai's Financial Industry
Reckless prudence
Definancialization, financial repression and policy continuity in East-Central Europe
The Road to Financialization in Central and Eastern Europe
The Financialization of Urban Policy in the Age of Obama
Reimagining geographies of public finance
Financial geography III
Financial market actors as urban policy-makers
State and collective ownership
The long shadow of the state
The invisible hand of the shareholding state
The de-financialization of housing
Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China
Transatlantic city, part 1
Planning centrality, market instruments
A multi-scalar view of urban financialization
Financialization of urban development in China
Changing roles of the state in the financialization of urban development through chengtou in China
Putting financialisation in its financial context
Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise
Profit-Making State Firms and China’s Development Experience
Selling City Futures
Reading risk
The state project of crisis management
Financialization, Urban Governance and the Planning System
Demolishing the Present to Sell off the Future? The Emergence of 'Financialized Municipal Entrepreneurialism' in London
Everyone wants this market to grow
Financialization and the third sector
Embedding futurity in urban governance
Variegated intersections of neoliberalism and financialization
Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets
Expropriation of Capitalist by State Capitalist
Financializing Detroit
Follow the Firm
Innovative Finance for Development? Vaccine Bonds and the Hidden Costs of Financialization
The rise of the 'shareholding state
The New Urban Fiscal Crisis
The Miracles of Bookkeeping
Financialization with Chinese characteristics? Exchanges, control and capital markets in authoritarian capitalism
Economization, part 2
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |