Urban Renewal and Strata Scheme Termination
Balancing Communal Management and Individual Property Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4142967 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hazel Easthope (0000-0002-8867-2180, City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia, corresponding author), Sarah Hudson (0000-0003-4881-652X, City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia, corresponding author), Bill Randolph (0000-0001-6815-0935, City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1421-1435 |
| Publication date | 2013-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/a4598 |
| OpenAlex | W2002020648 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 12 |
A debate is taking place in Australia regarding potential changes to the legislation governing what proportion of owners must agree before apartment buildings can be redeveloped and whether a collective sale model should be adopted in order to facilitate urban renewal. To date, urban renewal has proven challenging because of difficulties of coordinating renewal within a planning system that relies on the market to deliver housing. This challenge is amplified by the governance framework created to promote multiunit housing-strata title-and associated tensions between communal management and individual property rights. This paper makes particular reference to the implications of this debate in the greater Sydney metropolitan area, which raises universal issues regarding tensions between the government and the market and between individual rights and the collective good. This paper argues that there is a case for changing the legislation, with government involvement required to respond to the significant social issues raised, to guarantee the needs of existing owners and tenants are met, and to ensure that high-quality, economically viable, buildings result
Apartment · Business · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Law and economics · Legislation · Metropolitan area · Political science · Property rights · Public housing · Community Development and Social Impact · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Public Administration · Finance
Obtrusive Intimacy in Multi-Owned Housing
From fragmentation to framework
Diversity and participation in private apartment buildings
It depends what you mean by the term rights’
The land governance cost on co-ownership
Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types
The distribution of perceived advantages and disadvantages of infill development among owners of a commonhold and its’ implications
Power dynamics between local governments and multi-owned properties in redevelopment for densification
The implications of condominium neighbourhoods for long-term urban revitalisation
Public attitudes toward state-led urban village rehabilitation in Shenzhen, China
Contested surf tourism resources in the Maldives
The hierarchical prospects of housing redevelopment
Homeowners Saying “Yes, In My Back Yard
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |