Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

States of Dependency

Welfare, Rights, and American Governance, 1935-1972

Bibliographic Data

ID4155183
AuthorsKimberley Johnson (0009-0008-8459-3427, New York University, New York, New York, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume104
Issue4
Pages1082-1082
Publication date2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jahist/jax539
OpenAlexW2917707226
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Karen Tani's States of Dependency offers a complex understanding of how state development and bureaucratic capacity is created within a multijurisdictional polity. While social movements or individual members of Congress have played important roles in the expansion of the welfare state, Tani argues that national-level social welfare bureaucrats and “poverty lawyers” were critical and overlooked sources of support for welfare state expansion. Expanding state capacities in a multijurisdictional state is a tricky process: national-level bureaucrats had to rely on a mix of incentives and sanctions to push regional, state, and local actors toward a social welfare system based on tenets of modern governance: uniformity and equal treatment. This move toward rationalization jarred with the autonomous and powerful local and state agencies in charge of administering local poor relief in a crazy quilt of conflicting moralistic standards. Tani argues that national-level administrators and professional social workers turned to “rights language” to solve this massive governance problem. The implementers of this new national welfare state had devised ways to overpower or work around the local and state actors who were loath to give up their ability to discipline the poor of their communities. Through meticulous and revelatory archival work Tani shows that a “legalization approach,” which relied on “statutory and constitutional law,” allowed the national state to prevail (in retrospect, temporarily) over William J. Novak's “well-regulated” society, which persisted at the local level (William J. Novak, The People's Welfare, 1996, p. 1). These choices were consequential, as the welfare programs designed by these bureaucrats helped develop today's robust administrative state. The rights language deployed by welfare state administrators was not simply empty rhetoric; substantive procedural practices, including the right to fair hearings, the promulgation of equal protection principles, and state court litigation, helped embody these rights

Bureaucracy · Economics · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Sociology · State (computer science · Statutory law · Welfare · Welfare state · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Public Administration · Race, History, and American Society

  • To Coddle and Caress These Great Capitalists

    Noam Maggor•The American Historical Review•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae