Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doctrine and Race

African American Evangelicals and Fundamentalism between the Wars

Bibliographic Data

ID4157321
AuthorsWilliam E Montgomery (Austin Community College, Austin, Texas, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume104
Issue4
Pages1055-1056
Publication date2018-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jahist/jax508
OpenAlexW2886726390
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Mary Beth Swetnam Mathews situates Doctrine and Race at the intersection of several currents that defined the United States in the early twentieth century: (1) the rise of Protestant Christian fundamentalism in response to such theological “modernisms” as the social gospel and human evolution; (2) America's involvement in World War I to establish democracy around the world; and (3) the virulent racism that motivated bloodthirsty lynch mobs. Mathews asserts that fundamentalism was not primarily about race, but she nevertheless argues that leading white fundamentalists were imbued with the notion that African Americans were highly impressionable and easily misled. White fundamentalists regarded themselves as real Christians and viewed modernism as just another word for apostasy. By looking closely at white and black Baptists and Methodists, whose separate denominational trajectories passed close to one another from time to time and on certain issues, Mathews shows how differently whites and blacks responded to the new Protestant fundamentalist movement. White fundamentalists claimed to be defenders of the Protestant faith, that is, of biblical inerrancy, the divinity and virgin birth of Jesus Christ, righteous living, and the certain, literal return of Jesus to a doomed world. Black Baptists and Methodists did not necessarily disagree; in fact, they often sided with white fundamentalists and secular black leaders about how crucial “righteous living” was to race progress. But African Americans did not embrace the “fundamentalist” label despite their oft-stated preference for “old time religion.” African Americans were less worried about “modernism” than about social justice, which fundamentalists largely ignored. Christ beckoned everyone and promised salvation irrespective of race, and for black Baptists and Methodists, that was what fundamentalism should mean. Without that, African Americans could hardly have been less interested in fundamentalism

Faith · Fundamentalism · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Racism · Social Gospel · Sociology · Theology · White (mutation · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Gender Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Race, History, and American Society · Religious studies · Religious Studies

  • “Saved” by Interaction, Living by Race

    Open Access•Jelani Ince•Social Psychology Quarterly•2022

  • Born Again Black Panther

    Open Access•Dan Wells•Religion and American Culture A…•2020

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2022 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae