Robert Nixon and Police Torture in Chicago, 1871-1971
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4157348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | L Mara Dodge (Westfield State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 520-520 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of American History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jahist/jax243 |
| OpenAlex | W2748423314 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
In Robert Nixon and Police Torture in Chicago Elizabeth Dale provides a thought-provoking, well-written, and meticulously researched history of police violence. Using newspaper accounts and the records of eighty-six court trials, she identifies four hundred cases involving defendants who claimed that police used force or coercion, usually in an effort to extract confessions. The coercive techniques included physical abuse, deprivation, psychological pressure, and holding suspects incommunicado. Dale, a former Chicago civil rights attorney and a professor of history and law, is ideally qualified to explore these issues. Chapter 1 provides a concise overview of police torture from 1871 to 1936. For each decade, Dale traces changes in torture techniques, shifting public responses, and reformers' (mostly failed) efforts to curtail these practices. She also chronicles the evolution of Illinois and U.S. Supreme Court rulings. In 1936 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of violence to obtain confessions was unconstitutional (Brown v. Mississippi). Dale argues that violence continued but shifted form, relying more heavily on “techniques of invisibility” that would not leave visible marks (p. 102
Coercion (linguistics · Criminology · Human rights · Newspaper · Political science · Sociology · Supreme court · Torture · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Citations per year | 0.63 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |