Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Artistic Crimes and Misdemeanours

Bibliographic Data

ID4158520
AuthorsDavid Davies (0000-0002-7573-2762, McGill University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume59
Issue3
Pages305-321
Publication date2019-09-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/aesthj/ayz012
OpenAlexW2943896043
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Denis Dutton claimed that, to grasp why it matters to the artistic value of a painting like The Disciples at Emmaus that it was painted by van Meegeren in the first half of the twentieth century rather than by Vermeer in the seventeenth century, we need to locate what van Meegeren did in a wider class of 'artistic crimes' involving 'misrepresented artistic performances'. I begin by clarifying how the notions of 'artistic performance' and 'misrepresentation' are to be understood in the context of Dutton's paper. I survey a range of examples of misrepresented artistic performances in Dutton's sense, and ask when they involve 'artistic crimes'. I then seek a principled way of justifying what seem to be our clear intuitions-apparent in our artistic practice-as to which 'misrepresented artistic performances' are artistic crimes and which are not

Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Context (archaeology · Misrepresentation · Painting · Value (mathematics · Visual arts · Art History and Market Analysis · Computer Science · History · Law · Law in Society and Culture

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae