Musical works as eternal types
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4159677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julian Dodd (0000-0003-1737-7616, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 424-440 |
| Publication date | 2000-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.4.424 |
| OpenAlex | W2051739218 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
Critique de l'argument de la creatabilite developpe par J. Levinson afin de definir la composition musicale en tant qu'entite generique, et non pas en tant que structure sonore. Examinant le statut ontologique des proprietes et l'identite des types musicaux, l'A. rejette la troisieme premisse de l'argument selon laquelle les oeuvres musicales sont creees par les compositeurs
Aesthetics · Art · Musical · Visual arts · Communication · Design Education and Practice · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Psychology
Two Challenges to the Idea of Intellectual Property
The Type-Token Distinction and Four Problems with Propertarian IP Justifications
Proportionality, Abstract Causation, and the Exclusion Problem
Musical Mereology
Musical Works as Structural Universals
Establishments as Material rather than Immaterial Objects
Paraphrasability and the Causal Status of Types
Seeing the Fictional
Identity of the work of art
The problem of creation and abstract artifacts
The non-existence of institutional facts
The Ontology of Musical Works and the Role of Intuitions
I Could Have Done That
Musical Ontology and the Audibility of Musical Works
Creating abstract objects
Musical Works
Debates about the Ontology of Art
| Citations per year | 0.81 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |