Compulsion, Compensation and Property Rights in Britain, 1688-1833
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4161964 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julian Hoppit (UCL Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 210 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 93-128 |
| Publication date | 2011-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Past & Present (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-2746 • E-ISSN: 1477-464X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pastj/gtq060 |
| OpenAlex | W2083660506 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
It is a commonplace that property was worshipped with unusual devotion in Britain between the Glorious Revolution and the railway age. As Hannah More put it, ‘All property is sacred, and as the laws of the land are intended to fence in that property, he who brings up his children to break down any of these fences, brings them up to certain sin and ruin’.1 Such views of the interrelated importance of property and the rule of law have led to major interpretations of the interplay of Britain’s economic, social and political histories, including that secure property rights were a vital foundation for the first industrial revolution. Yet property was often heavily taxed, frequently expropriated and, exceptionally, eradicated through redefinition. Such vulnerabilities did not diminish after the Glorious Revolution, they increased — mainly because parliament now met annually, had greater sovereign power than earlier monarchs and legislated prolifically regarding property. After 1688, Britain’s economic precocity rested less on the enhanced ‘security’ of property in any general sense of the word, much more on respect for parliament’s authority and its willingness to allow property to be alienated, most usually by particular interests claiming to act for the public or wider good. At times this required the reversal of commitments made only a generation earlier, raising doubts about central government’s credibility. Taken together, these uncertainties over property rights were sufficient for some to question whether property had a sound theoretical basis at all.
Economics · Eminent Domain · Law and economics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Property (philosophy) · Property law · Property rights · Public property · Real property · Settlement (finance) · Sociology · Sovereignty · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy
A Great Electioneer and His Motives Reconsidered
New York's Refugees and Political Authority in Revolutionary America
The Glorious Revolution and Access to Parliament
Economic Liberalism and Rights in the Nineteenth Century
Legacies of British Slave-Ownership
The Isle of Man and Britain’s Eighteenth-Century Empire
An Alternative Genealogy for Global Capitalism
The Double Life of Property
Troubling Memories
Under ye Lash of ye Law”
Performing Public Credit at the Eighteenth-Century Bank of England
The Czar and the Slaves
The Scottish Enlightenment and the Remaking of Modern History
Private Benefits, Public Vices
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,93 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |