Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

John Spencer and the Perils of Sacred Philology

Bibliographic Data

ID4162989
AuthorsDaniel Stolzenberg (0000-0001-7807-2213, University of California, Davis, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume214
Issue1
Pages129-163
Publication date2012-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePast & Present (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2746 • E-ISSN: 1477-464X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pastj/gtr031
OpenAlexW2320269217
LanguageEN
Citations received7

In 1650 the Bible's status as infallible revelation — unique guide to salvation and universal history of mankind's origins — appeared secure to most educated Europeans. True, more than a century of confessional struggle and theological debate had exposed scripture to unprecedented scrutiny and proliferating interpretations. Yet, amid the wrangling, scarcely any author questioned its divine authorship or historical reliability. Meanwhile, biblical scholars were at work shoring up the foundations of scriptural authority with the tools of Renaissance philology. But appearances were deceptive. The following decades witnessed scandalous publications by Thomas Hobbes, Isaac La Peyrère and Baruch Spinoza, which openly challenged established assumptions about the Bible, setting the stage for Enlightenment polemicists such as John Toland and Voltaire. Historical scholarship was a major arena for these debates, with orthodoxy challenged, not only by evidence extending the age of the world beyond the confines of biblical chronology, but also by arguments displacing the Hebrew nation from its privileged historical role. Enlightenment critics of Judaeo-Christian revelation, from Toland at the beginning of the eighteenth century to Friedrich Schiller at the end, turned sacred history on its head by arguing that, long before the Jews, the ancient Egyptians possessed a monotheistic religion, which Moses, raised in their culture, plagiarized.1

Art · Confessional · Enlightenment · Historiography · Literature · Orthodoxy · Philology · Politics · Revelation · Scholarship · Scrutiny · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

  • The Church of England, the Nonconformists and Reason

    Open Access•Christopher Haigh•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•2017

  • Enlightenment and Religious Politics in Restoration England

    Open Access•William J Bulman•History Compass•2012

  • An Ægyptian darknesse”

    Stephanie Pope, Stephanie L Pope•The Seventeenth Century•2021

  • Alexander Ross’s Pansebeia (1653), religious compendia and the seventeenth-century study of religious diversity

    R J W Mills, Robert Mills•The Seventeenth Century•2016

  • Sacred History and Political Thought

    Open Access•John Robertson•The Historical Journal•2013

  • Applying the Right Measure

    Open Access•Jetze Touber•The Historical Journal•2015

  • From Sovereignty to Solidarity

    Robert A Yelle, Robert Yelle•History of Religions•2019

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2012 - 2021 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae