Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Distinguishing between the effects of swing ratio and bias on outcomes in the US Electoral College, 1900-1992

Bibliographic Data

ID4170830
AuthorsB Grofman (0000-0002-2801-3351, University of California, Irvine), Thomas L Brunell (0000-0003-3077-5037, University of California, Irvine), Thomas Brunell, Janet Campagna
Year1997
Volume16
Issue4
Pages471-487
Publication date1997-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueElectoral Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-3794 • E-ISSN: 1873-6890
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/s0261-3794(97)00047-4
OpenAlexW2042636472
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited19

Competition (biology · Confusion · Democracy · Demographic economics · Economics · Electoral college · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Statistics · Swing · Value (mathematics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Sports Analytics and Performance

  • Partisan Bias in the Electoral College

    Open Access•Phillip Ardoin, Bryan M Parsons•Politics & Policy•2007

  • The Empirical Implications of Electoral College Reform

    Open Access•Darshan J Goux, David A Hopkins•American Politics Research•2008

  • Why noncompetitive states are so important for understanding the outcomes of competitive elections

    Open Access•Jonathan R Cervas, B Grofman•Public Choice•2017

  • Are Presidential Inversions Inevitable? Comparing Eight Counterfactual Rules for Electing the U.S. President

    Open Access•Jonathan R Cervas, B Grofman•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • The U.S. Electoral College and Spatial Biases in Voter Power

    Barney Warf•Annals of the Association of…•2009

  • A Bayesian Prediction Model for the U.S. Presidential Election

    Open Access•Steven E Rigdon, Sheldon H Jacobson et al.•American Politics Research•2009

  • An integrated perspective on the three potential sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•B Grofman, William Koetzle et al.•Electoral Studies•1997

  • Legislative Party Turnover and Electoral Volatility

    Grigorii V Golosov•Comparative Sociology•2018

  • Party systems, electoral systems, and legislative fragmentation

    Open Access•Grigorii V Golosov•Party Politics•2017

  • The Responsiveness of Direct and Indirect Elections

    Open Access•Steven Rogers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Electoral Disproportionality and Bias Under the Alternative Vote

    Ron Johnston, James Forrest•Australian Journal of Political…•2009

  • Electoral College Winner's Advantage

    Open Access•Jack E Riggs, Gerald R Hobbs et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2009

  • The electors shall meet in their respective states

    Open Access•Charles Pattie, Ron Johnston•Political Geography•2014

  • Tools for identifying partisan gerrymandering with an application to congressional districting in Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Jonathan R Cervas, B Grofman•Political Geography•2020

  • A taxonomy of runoff methods

    Open Access•B Grofman•Electoral Studies•2008

  • Measuring bias

    Open Access•Galina Borisyuk, Ron Johnston et al.•Electoral Studies•2008

  • Seats, Votes, and the Spatial Organization of Elections

    Graham Gudgin•Seats, Votes, and the Spatial…•1980

  • Politics and Society in the South

    Earl Black, Merle Black•Politics and Society in the South•2005

  • Partisan realignment

    Jerome M Clubb•Partisan realignment•1980

  • Representation, Swing, and Bias in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1872-1988

    James Garand, James C Garand et al.•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • The Vital South

    Open Access•Frank J Sorauf, Frank Sorauf•Political Science Quarterly•1992

  • Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections

    Gary King, Andrew Gelman•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Partisan Redistricting and the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Alan I Abramowitz•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Party Control and Partisan Bias in 1980s Congressional Redistricting

    Janet Campagna, B Grofman•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Partisan Redistricting and the 1992 Congressional Elections

    Richard G Niemi, Alan I Abramowitz•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans

    Andrew Gelman, Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems

    Open Access•Edward R Tufte•American Political Science Review•1973

  • An integrated perspective on the three potential sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•B Grofman, William Koetzle et al.•Electoral Studies•1997

  • A Theory of Political Districting

    Open Access•Richard G Niemi, John Deegan•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary King, Robert Browning et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Seats and votes

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Social Science Research•1973

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,55
Citation span1997 - 2020 (24)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae