Science, Providence, and Progress at the Great Exhibition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4175091 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geoffrey Cantor (0000-0003-2344-5814, University College London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 103 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 439-459 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Isis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-1753 • E-ISSN: 1545-6994 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/667968 |
| PMID | 23286186 |
| OpenAlex | W2322428299 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
The Great Exhibition of 1851 is generally interpreted as a thoroughly secular event that celebrated progress in science, technology, and industry. In contrast to this perception, however, the exhibition was viewed by many contemporaries as a religious event of considerable importance. Although some religious commentators were highly critical of the exhibition and condemned the display of artifacts in the Crystal Palace as giving succor to materialism, others incorporated science and technology into their religious frameworks. Drawing on sermons, tracts, and the religious periodical press, this essay pays close attention to the ways in which science and technology were endowed with providentialist significance and particularly examines the notion of human progress used by a number of Christian writers, especially Congregationalists, who set scientific and technological progress within a teleological religious perspective. This discussion sheds fresh light not only on the Great Exhibition itself but also on the deployment of natural theology in mid-nineteenth-century Britain
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Art history · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Event (particle physics) · Exhibition · Materialism · Natural (archaeology) · Perspective (graphical) · Sociology · Teleology · Visual arts · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |