Empires, Famine, and the Significance of the Political Economy of Colonialism
From the Mughal Empire to British Colonial Rule in India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4180963 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G K Bhambra (0000-0003-3658-1575, University of Sussex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-9756 • E-ISSN: 1474-0583 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003975625000050 |
| OpenAlex | W4409511633 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 34 |
Empires and nation states tend to be understood as two distinct types of political organization. The former are primarily associated with the premodern world, while the latter have come to be seen as political forms paradigmatic of the modern. While colonialism is a process associated with empires, it is more usually practised by modern nation states in their establishment of overseas empires. These empires are marked by a particular form of political economy-a colonial political economy-which determines the specificity of their political form as distinct from earlier empires. In this article, I examine the Mughal Empire of the premodern period in relation to the subsequent establishment of British colonial rule in India, and discuss the particularities of each in terms of the modes of political economy-moral and colonial-which were characteristic of their administration. In particular, I address the mobilization of the precepts of classical liberalism by the British, as demonstrated in the response of colonial administrators to incidences of dearth and famine, and contrast this with the modes of governance of the preceding Mughal Empire. The differences between them, I suggest, demonstrate that British colonial rule was a structurally distinct, modern type of empire
Ancient history · Archaeology · British Empire · Colonial rule · Colonialism · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Empire · Famine · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · History · Law · Social and Economic Development in India
The English utilitarians and India.
Lumpenbourgeoisie : Lumpendevelopment
Revenue and Reform
Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India
Classical Political Economy and British Policy in India
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development
Reversal of Fortune
Liberalism and Empire
Poverty and Famines
Revenue, rent…profit? Early British imperialism1, political economy and the search for a differentia specifica ( inter se )
Famine in Bengal
Colonial global economy
The King’s Plunder, the King’s Justice
British colonial policy and famines
Empires and Colonialism
A Politie of Civill & Military Power”
Lineages of Empire
Empires in World History
Towards an interpretation of the Mughal Empire
Famine in a land of plenty
Famines in Kashmir, 1586-1819
Famine policies in pre‐British India and the question of moral economy
Marx's Initial Problematic
Famine That Kills, Darfur, Sudan 1984–1985
The Real Value of the Lands
People, taxation and trade in Mughal India
The Classical Base of Modem Rent Theory
Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |