Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Meaning of the PRC's Development Since 1949

Bibliographic Data

ID4182261
AuthorsErnest G Raiklin, Ernest Raiklin (Herzen University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume3
Issue2
Publication date2013-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2158244013490700
OpenAlexW2171534866
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

The purpose of this article is to search for answers to the following four questions: First, what is the social meaning of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) development prior to 1978? Second, how to interpret the Chinese social drive since 1978? Third, what is the balance sheet of the PRC's development since 1949? Finally, on the basis of the exploration of China's growth during the two periods, is it possible to extrapolate into a social structure of the country in the foreseeable future? In pursuing its objectives, the article does not judge China's road as it should be from a theoretical point of view but simply examines it as it is or might be in practice. China's development from 1949 to present has taken several socioeconomic forms: 1949-1958, from a prevalent nonstate feudalism to a dominant state feudalism; 1960-1966, elements of mixed capitalism within state feudalism; 1966-1976, the split within the state capitalist and feudal bureaucracies; since 1978, authoritarian state capitalism. Thus, the Chinese road turned out to be not that of " socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics" but of state capitalist market economy with, of course, Chinese characteristics. It is argued that remarkable economic achievements of the PRC have not been due to "socialism" but due to various forms of capitalism and feudalism, which the circumstances have forced upon the country's development

Authoritarianism · Bureaucracy · Capitalism · China · Communism · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Feudalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Socialism · Sociology · State capitalism · State socialism · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law

  • Financial deepening and income inequality

    Kristijan Kotarski•China Economic Journal•2015

  • What Limits the Benefits of Land-Lost Farmers in Chinese Courts? An Investigation of Chinese Land Acquisition and Resettlement Cases in the Yangtze River Delta

    Open Access•Wenzhang Zhou, Haijun Bao•SAGE Open•2021

  • China's modern economy in historical perspective

    Dwight Heald Perkins, Kang Chao•China's modern economy in…•1975

  • Affirmative Action in China and the U.S.

    Open Access•Minglang Zhou, Ann Maxwell Hill•Affirmative Action in China and…•2009

  • Grain-for-green policy and its impacts on grain supply in West China

    Open Access•Zhiming Feng, Yanzhao Yang et al.•Land Use Policy•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,18
Citation span2015 - 2021 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae