Is incoherence required for sustainability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4189036 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Olivier Hamant (0000-0001-6906-6620, Lyon 1 Université, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 129-139 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20530196241249680 |
| OpenAlex | W4396746161 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Unstoppable feedback loops and tipping points in socio-ecological systems are the main threats to sustainability. These behaviors have been extensively studied, notably to predict, and arguably deviate, dead-end trajectories. A core group of repeated and predictable patterns in all systems, called systems archetypes, has been identified. For instance, the archetype of escalation is made of two positive feedback loops fueling one another. Interestingly, none of the known archetypes provide sustainability: they all trigger endless amplification. In parallel, systems biologists have made considerable progress on the role of incoherent loops in molecular networks in the past 20 years. Such patterns in biological networks produce stability and a form of intrinsic autonomy for all functions, from circadian rhythm to immunity. Incoherence is the fuel of homeostasis of living systems. Here, I bridge both conclusions and propose that incoherence should be included in the list of systems archetypes, and considered as an operational way to buffer socio-ecological fluctuations. This proposition is supported by the well-known trade-off between robustness and efficiency: adaptability requires some degree of internal contradiction. This applies to both technical and social systems: incoherent strategies recognize and fuel the diversity of solutions; they are the essential, yet often ignored, components of cooperation. Building on these theoretical considerations and real-life examples, incoherence might offer a counterintuitive, but transformative, way out of the Great Acceleration, and possibly, an actionable lever for decision makers
Adaptability · Archetype · Autonomy · Biology · Business · Counterintuitive · Economics · Epistemology · Evolvability · Living systems · Political science · Sociology · Structuring · Sustainability · Transformative learning · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Artificial Intelligence · Ecology
Arms and insecurity
The Benefits of Imperfection
Governing the Commons
Loosely Coupled Systems
Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
Countering the “wrong story”
Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process
Balancing efficiency and resilience objectives in pursuit of sustainable infrastructure transformations
Improving ratings’
Capitalism and the Curse of Energy Efficiency
Making representative democracy work
Conservative advocacy journalism
Ego depletion
Justifying the Jury
The trajectory of the Anthropocene
Du bruit comme principe d'auto-organisation
Weak Police, Strong Democracy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|