Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The geology of the ruling class

Bibliographic Data

ID4189196
AuthorsDaniel Cunha (0000-0001-5586-6184, Sinal de Menos, Brazil)
Year2015
Volume2
Issue3
Pages262-266
Publication date2015-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2053019615607069
OpenAlexW2265440776
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited10

Andreas Malm and Alf Hornborg argued in The Anthropocene Review that the Anthropocene narrative should be challenged, because the material resources of the Earth are actually unevenly exploited and consumed, with inequality across classes and nations. Though there is no disagreement regarding this point, it is argued here that the implied notion of control of global biogeochemical cycles by the ruling class is misplaced, and that the most fundamental concept for a critical understanding of the Anthropocene is fetishism, i.e. the Anthropocene is characterized by a lack of social (or class) control. We claim also that this theoretical discussion is of utmost political importance

Anthropocene · Class (philosophy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Fetishism · Inequality · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropology · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Political Economy and Marxism · History · Law · Philosophy

  • Equity and Justice should underpin the discourse on Tipping Points

    Open Access•Laura M Pereira, Laura Pereira et al.•2023

  • Ice and Ivory

    Open Access•C Wrigley•Journal of Political Ecology•2021

  • Yes, it is all about fetishism

    Open Access•A Hornborg, Andreas Malm•The Anthropocene Review•2016

  • The greening of uneven and combined development

    Johanna Siebert•Cambridge Review of International…•2020

  • The Anthropocene and the production and reproduction of capital

    Open Access•Carles Soriano•The Anthropocene Review•2018

  • Reification and passivity in the face of climate change

    Open Access•Paul Leduc Browne•European Journal of Social Theory•2018

  • Unearthing value

    Santiago Acosta, Sergio Fernandez Acosta•Journal of Latin American…•2025

  • Time, Labor, and Social Domination

    Open Access•Moishe Postone•Time, labor, and social domination•1993

  • ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution

    Open Access•Hans Joachim Schellnhuber•Nature•1999

  • Geology of mankind

    Open Access•Paul J Crutzen, Sheldon A Zabel•Nature•2002

  • The Origins of Fossil Capital

    Andreas Malm•Historical Materialism•2013

  • Reason and revolution

    Herbert Marcuse•Reason and revolution•1999

  • The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative

    Open Access•Andreas Malm, A Hornborg•The Anthropocene Review•2014

  • The trajectory of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Wendy Broadgate et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2015

  • The End of the Road? Agricultural Revolutions in the Capitalist World-Ecology, 1450-2010

    Open Access•J W Moore•Journal of Agrarian Change•2010

Citations per year0.7
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae