The Reception of Pushkin's Poetic Works in the 1820s
A Study of the Critic's Role
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4211252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Debreczeny (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1969 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 394-415 |
| Publication date | 1969-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slavic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2494018 |
| OpenAlex | W2317283725 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The relationship between Pushkin and his critics has been a subject of considerable interest and discussion since the poet's own time. Belinsky made it the focus of the introduction to his series of essays on Pushkin. The early biographers provided some further information, and scholarly attention dates from the 1889 monograph by S. S. Trubachev, Pushkin v russkoi kritike, 1820-1880, which appeared shortly after V. A. Zelinsky had published, between 1887 and 1889, his extremely useful anthology of Pushkin criticism. The monograph is little more than a pedestrian rehearsal of reviews, digressing only to promulgate such myths as Pushkin's "aristocratic" attitude toward critics, but it remains valuable as a catalogue of criticism. Thereafter, both before the Revolution and during the Soviet period, the relevant published material becomes too extensive to list here. Recent comprehensive treatments of the subject may be found in N. I. Mordovchenko's Russkaia kritika pervoi chetverti XIX veka (1959) and in the Academy publication Pushkin: Itogi i problemy izucheniia (1966
Aesthetics · Art · Criticism · Library science · Literature · Mythology · Period (music · Poetry · Subject (documents · Classics · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |