Bureaucracy as Culture
A Comment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4211943 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George Yaney (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 104-111 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slavic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2496638 |
| OpenAlex | W2313192089 |
| Language | EN |
Each of the foregoing articles deals with a separate department of Soviet government. Thomas Remington's State Control Commissariat began as an agency for auditing accounts; David Christian's procuracy has always had the task of checking on the legality of the government's operation. In practice the two departments seem to have been doing the same thing: sending out agents with virtually arbitrary power in the hope that they will make the government's operating departments obey the government's rules and perform their tasks with maximum efficiency. Remington refers to this activity as control. Christian calls it supervision. Christian's term monitoring comes close to describing both activities
Agency (philosophy · Audit · Bureaucracy · Control (management · Economics · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Principle of legality · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Task (project management · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|