What Is Good Design
A Comment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4213274 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Granick (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 584-586 |
| Publication date | 1978-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slavic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2496124 |
| OpenAlex | W2317378153 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
I am fully in agreement with Mr. Hutchings as to the major importance of design in determining the quality of an economy's products. Indeed, I would extend this view to a statement that design is equally important in determining the appropriateness of specific methods of production in the light of the economy's physical and human resources. I think that we are all indebted to Hutchings for making the case and for distinguishing between design and technology. However, while Hutchings discusses the contribution of design to various Soviet industries, he fails to provide criteria for distinguishing between good and bad product design. It is to this elementary task that I wish primarily to direct my remarks
Business · Economics · Epistemology · Management · Microeconomics · Political science · Product (mathematics · Product design · Production (economics · Quality (philosophy · Statement (logic · Task (project management · Computer Science · Economic Development and Digital Transformation · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Russia and Soviet political economy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|