Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Did Serf Owners Control Serf Marriage? Orlov Serfs and Their Neighbors, 1773-1861

Bibliographic Data

ID4214531
AuthorsJohn Bushnell (Northwestern University, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume52
Issue3
Pages419-445
Publication date1993-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSlavic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2499717
OpenAlexW2320742132
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited3

Historians of the Russian peasantry hold almost unanimously that serfowners routinely intervened in serf marriage: that they generally forbade serf women to leave the estate through marriage or marry at all without permission, commanded serfs to marry young, made compulsory matches when their serfs failed to marry on schedule, and otherwise prevented serfs from exercising free choice in marriage. Equally common is the assumption that the nobles' interest in serf marriage was the multiplication of human property and the number of duespaying labor units, i.e., married couples. The one exception is Steven Hoch, who found that on the Gagarin estate of Petrovskoe, Tambov province, managers never intervened, at least in first marriages. They never had to, Hoch argues, because the heads of peasant households shared the owners' interest in early and universal marriage. That was because estate managers allocated land, the only significant economic resource, to married couples on an egalitarian basis. Even Hoch accepts the standard view that, on other estates where different socioeconomic conditions held, estate authorities did have to intervene to ensure that serfs married early and universally

Economic history · Estate · Genealogy · Inheritance (genetic algorithm · Luck · Peasant · Political science · Population · Property (philosophy · Quarter (Canadian coin · Real estate · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Theology · Demography · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Soviet and Russian History

  • Social Revolution in Russian Female Monasticism

    Marlyn Miller•Russian History•2013

  • Household formation, institutions, and economic development

    Tracy Dennison•The History of the Family•2011

  • Power and inheritance

    Karl Kaser•The History of the Family•2002

  • Bondage

    Alessandro Stanziani•Bondage•2014

  • On Good Numbers and Bad

    Open Access•Steven L Hoch•Slavic Review•1994

  • The Traveling Panopticon

    Open Access•Alessandro Stanziani•Comparative Studies in Society…•2009

  • Family Forms in Historic Europe

    Open Access•Richard Wall•Family Forms in Historic Europe•1983

  • Unfree Labor

    Robert L Hall, Peter Kolchin•Journal of the Early Republic•1988

  • The Perennial Multiple Family Household, Mishino, Russia 1782 - 1858

    Open Access•Peter Czap•Journal of Family History•1982

Citations per year0.19
Citation span1994 - 2014 (21)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae